Re: [PATCH v2] staging: r8188eu: os_dep: simplifiy the rtw_resume function

[Greg KH]

On Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 11:17:20PM +0530, Saurav Girepunje wrote:
> 
> 
> On 05/09/21 8:18 pm, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 04, 2021 at 05:44:44PM +0530, Saurav Girepunje wrote:
> > > Remove unused variable ret and pwrpriv.
> > > Remove the condition with no effect (if == else) in usb_intf.c
> > > file.
> > > Remove rtw_resume_process() and move whole thing to rtw_resume().
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Saurav Girepunje <saurav.girepunje@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > 
> > > ChangeLog V2:
> > > - Remove rtw_resume_process() and move whole thing to rtw_resume().
> > > ---
> > >   drivers/staging/r8188eu/include/usb_osintf.h |  2 --
> > >   drivers/staging/r8188eu/os_dep/usb_intf.c    | 12 ------------
> > >   2 files changed, 14 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/include/usb_osintf.h b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/include/usb_osintf.h
> > > index d1a1f739309c..34229b1cb081 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/include/usb_osintf.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/include/usb_osintf.h
> > > @@ -24,6 +24,4 @@ void *scdb_findEntry(struct adapter *priv, unsigned char *macAddr,
> > >   void nat25_db_expire(struct adapter *priv);
> > >   int nat25_db_handle(struct adapter *priv, struct sk_buff *skb, int method);
> > > 
> > > -int rtw_resume_process(struct adapter *padapter);
> > > -
> > >   #endif
> > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/os_dep/usb_intf.c b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/os_dep/usb_intf.c
> > > index bb85ab77fd26..77b03e7631b7 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/os_dep/usb_intf.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/os_dep/usb_intf.c
> > > @@ -493,18 +493,6 @@ static int rtw_resume(struct usb_interface *pusb_intf)
> > >   {
> > >   	struct dvobj_priv *dvobj = usb_get_intfdata(pusb_intf);
> > >   	struct adapter *padapter = dvobj->if1;
> > > -	struct pwrctrl_priv *pwrpriv = &padapter->pwrctrlpriv;
> > > -	int ret = 0;
> > > -
> > > -	if (pwrpriv->bInternalAutoSuspend)
> > > -		ret = rtw_resume_process(padapter);
> > > -	else
> > > -		ret = rtw_resume_process(padapter);
> > > -	return ret;
> > > -}
> > > -
> > > -int rtw_resume_process(struct adapter *padapter)
> > > -{
> > >   	struct net_device *pnetdev;
> > >   	struct pwrctrl_priv *pwrpriv = NULL;
> > >   	int ret = -1;
> > 
> > You can also remove the test for padapter being NULL in this function,
> > as you just proved it could never be null otherwise the above function
> > you removed would have crashed, right?  You should do that all at once
> > so we remember why that test was removed.
> > 
> > thanks,
> > 
> > greg k-h
> > 
> 
> Yes, padapter was deference without checking it could be NULL on rtw_resume.

How can it ever be NULL there?

> I think having NULL check would be safe. However if padapter is NULL then on
> goto exit "if (pwrpriv)" condition  will never true as pwrpriv is
> initialized with NULL. There should be one more goto exit just to return.!
> 
> let me know you thought greg,

Don't check for things that can never happen.

thanks,

greg k-h