[PATCH v2 2/2] x86/asm: pessimize the pre-initialization case in static_cpu_has()
From: H. Peter Anvin (Intel)
Date: Thu Sep 09 2021 - 18:08:53 EST
gcc will sometimes manifest the address of boot_cpu_data in a register
as part of constant propagation. When multiple static_cpu_has() are
used this may foul the mainline code with a register load which will
only be used on the fallback path, which is unused after
initialization.
Explicitly force gcc to use immediate (rip-relative on x86-64)
addressing for the fallback path, thus removing any possible register
use from static_cpu_has().
While making changes, modernize the code to use
.pushsection...popsection instead of .section...previous.
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin (Intel) <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 13 +++++++++----
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
index 16a51e7288d5..1261842d006c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
@@ -173,20 +173,25 @@ extern void clear_cpu_cap(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c, unsigned int bit);
* means that the boot_cpu_has() variant is already fast enough for the
* majority of cases and you should stick to using it as it is generally
* only two instructions: a RIP-relative MOV and a TEST.
+ *
+ * Do not use an "m" constraint for [cap_byte] here: gcc doesn't know
+ * that this is only used on a fallback path and will sometimes cause
+ * it to manifest the address of boot_cpu_data in a register, fouling
+ * the mainline (post-initialization) code.
*/
static __always_inline bool _static_cpu_has(u16 bit)
{
asm_volatile_goto(
ALTERNATIVE_TERNARY("jmp 6f", %P[feature], "", "jmp %l[t_no]")
- ".section .altinstr_aux,\"ax\"\n"
+ ".pushsection .altinstr_aux,\"ax\"\n"
"6:\n"
- " testb %[bitnum],%[cap_byte]\n"
+ " testb %[bitnum]," _ASM_RIP(%P[cap_byte]) "\n"
" jnz %l[t_yes]\n"
" jmp %l[t_no]\n"
- ".previous\n"
+ ".popsection\n"
: : [feature] "i" (bit),
[bitnum] "i" (1 << (bit & 7)),
- [cap_byte] "m" (((const char *)boot_cpu_data.x86_capability)[bit >> 3])
+ [cap_byte] "i" (&((const char *)boot_cpu_data.x86_capability)[bit >> 3])
: : t_yes, t_no);
t_yes:
return true;
--
2.31.1