On Sat, Aug 14, 2021 at 2:00 PM Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, 29 Jul 2021 07:21:47 PDT (-0700), masahiroy@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Currently, the (z)install targets in arch/riscv/Makefile descend into
> arch/riscv/boot/Makefile to invoke the shell script, but there is no
> good reason to do so.
>
> arch/riscv/Makefile can run the shell script directly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> arch/riscv/Makefile | 7 +++++--
> arch/riscv/boot/Makefile | 8 --------
> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/Makefile b/arch/riscv/Makefile
> index bc74afdbf31e..3c437fb09a07 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/riscv/Makefile
> @@ -126,8 +126,11 @@ $(BOOT_TARGETS): vmlinux
> Image.%: Image
> $(Q)$(MAKE) $(build)=$(boot) $(boot)/$@
>
> -zinstall install:
> - $(Q)$(MAKE) $(build)=$(boot) $@
> +install: install-image = Image
> +zinstall: install-image = Image.gz
> +install zinstall:
> + $(CONFIG_SHELL) $(srctree)/$(boot)/install.sh $(KERNELRELEASE) \
> + $(boot)/$(install-image) System.map "$(INSTALL_PATH)"
>
> archclean:
> $(Q)$(MAKE) $(clean)=$(boot)
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/boot/Makefile b/arch/riscv/boot/Makefile
> index 6bf299f70c27..becd0621071c 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/boot/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/riscv/boot/Makefile
> @@ -58,11 +58,3 @@ $(obj)/Image.lzo: $(obj)/Image FORCE
>
> $(obj)/loader.bin: $(obj)/loader FORCE
> $(call if_changed,objcopy)
> -
> -install:
> - $(CONFIG_SHELL) $(srctree)/$(src)/install.sh $(KERNELRELEASE) \
> - $(obj)/Image System.map "$(INSTALL_PATH)"
> -
> -zinstall:
> - $(CONFIG_SHELL) $(srctree)/$(src)/install.sh $(KERNELRELEASE) \
> - $(obj)/Image.gz System.map "$(INSTALL_PATH)"
Admittidly I don't see a reason to do it this way either, but it looks
like the other common ports (I checked arm64 and x86) are doing things
this way. I don't really care that much about which way we do it, but
it'd be better to keep everyone aligned.
Are you converting the other ports over as well?
Yes.