[PATCH 5.4 134/144] x86/resctrl: Fix a maybe-uninitialized build warning treated as error
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Date: Mon Sep 13 2021 - 09:31:58 EST
From: Babu Moger <babu.moger@xxxxxxx>
commit 527f721478bce3f49b513a733bacd19d6f34b08c upstream.
The recent commit
064855a69003 ("x86/resctrl: Fix default monitoring groups reporting")
caused a RHEL build failure with an uninitialized variable warning
treated as an error because it removed the default case snippet.
The RHEL Makefile uses '-Werror=maybe-uninitialized' to force possibly
uninitialized variable warnings to be treated as errors. This is also
reported by smatch via the 0day robot.
The error from the RHEL build is:
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c: In function ‘__mon_event_count’:
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c:261:12: error: ‘m’ may be used
uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
m->chunks += chunks;
^~
The upstream Makefile does not build using '-Werror=maybe-uninitialized'.
So, the problem is not seen there. Fix the problem by putting back the
default case snippet.
[ bp: note that there's nothing wrong with the code and other compilers
do not trigger this warning - this is being done just so the RHEL compiler
is happy. ]
Fixes: 064855a69003 ("x86/resctrl: Fix default monitoring groups reporting")
Reported-by: Terry Bowman <Terry.Bowman@xxxxxxx>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Babu Moger <babu.moger@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/162949631908.23903.17090272726012848523.stgit@bmoger-ubuntu
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c
@@ -242,6 +242,12 @@ static u64 __mon_event_count(u32 rmid, s
case QOS_L3_MBM_LOCAL_EVENT_ID:
m = &rr->d->mbm_local[rmid];
break;
+ default:
+ /*
+ * Code would never reach here because an invalid
+ * event id would fail the __rmid_read.
+ */
+ return RMID_VAL_ERROR;
}
if (rr->first) {