Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] drm/vc4: hdmi: Actually check for the connector status in hotplug
From: Maxime Ripard
Date: Tue Sep 14 2021 - 11:04:13 EST
Hi Daniel,
On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 04:34:08PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 12:17:24PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > The drm_helper_hpd_irq_event() documentation states that this function
> > is "useful for drivers which can't or don't track hotplug interrupts for
> > each connector." and that "Drivers which support hotplug interrupts for
> > each connector individually and which have a more fine-grained detect
> > logic should bypass this code and directly call
> > drm_kms_helper_hotplug_event()". This is thus what we ended-up doing.
> >
> > However, what this actually means, and is further explained in the
> > drm_kms_helper_hotplug_event() documentation, is that
> > drm_kms_helper_hotplug_event() should be called by drivers that can
> > track the connection status change, and if it has changed we should call
> > that function.
> >
> > This underlying expectation we failed to provide is that the caller of
> > drm_kms_helper_hotplug_event() should call drm_helper_probe_detect() to
> > probe the new status of the connector.
> >
> > Since we didn't do it, it meant that even though we were sending the
> > notification to user-space and the DRM clients that something changed we
> > never probed or updated our internal connector status ourselves.
> >
> > This went mostly unnoticed since the detect callback usually doesn't
> > have any side-effect. Also, if we were using the DRM fbdev emulation
> > (which is a DRM client), or any user-space application that can deal
> > with hotplug events, chances are they would react to the hotplug event
> > by probing the connector status eventually.
> >
> > However, now that we have to enable the scrambler in detect() if it was
> > enabled it has a side effect, and an application such as Kodi or
> > modetest doesn't deal with hotplug events. This resulted with a black
> > screen when Kodi or modetest was running when a screen was disconnected
> > and then reconnected, or switched off and on.
>
> Uh, why are you running this scrambler restore in your probe function? I
> guess it works, but most drivers that do expensive hotplug restore to
> handle the "no black screen for replug" use-case handle that in their own
> dedicated code.
That's what I got from our discussion back in June (I think?). The
discussion was about an issue we were having back then where one would
disconnect / reconnect the display while it had been setup through SCDC
to use the scrambler and higher bit ratio.
During that power cycle (that also happens when you turn a TV off and
on), the display would obviously reset its SCDC status. But if there's
nothing to handle the uevent, then the same mode remains applied
resulting in a blank screen.
If we're not supposed to set the SCDC status again in detect(), how
would we deal with this?
> But those also tend to have per-output hpd interrupt sources, so maybe
> that's why?
We do have an per-output HPD interrupt here
Maximey
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature