Re: [PATCH -next] irqdomain: fix overflow error
From: Bixuan Cui
Date: Wed Sep 15 2021 - 05:38:35 EST
On 2021/9/15 15:49, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 15 2021 at 10:03, Bixuan Cui wrote:
>> On 2021/9/14 19:56, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>
>> And kernel/irq/irqdomain.c
>> struct irq_domain *irq_domain_create_simple(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
>> unsigned int size,
>> unsigned int first_irq,
>> const struct irq_domain_ops *ops,
>> void *host_data)
>> {
>> struct irq_domain *domain;
>>
>> domain = __irq_domain_add(fwnode, size, size, 0, ops, host_data);
>>
>> All 'size' passed to __irq_domain_add() are unsigned int.
>>
>> So I think it's more appropriate to replace it with unsigned int.
> Appropriate is not really a technical reason. Making the code consistent
> is.
>
> But that has nothing to do with the completely bogus compiler warning in
> the changelog you provided.
Hello,
It is a real compilation warning, It occurs when compiled with
.config(https://syzkaller.appspot.com/text?tag=KernelConfig&x=4d196bb8b1e038c0).
This is my compile log:
// cp .config from https://syzkaller.appspot.com/text?tag=KernelConfig&x=4d196bb8b1e038c0
$ make menuconfig
$ make kernel/irq/irqdomain.o
SYNC include/config/auto.conf.cmd
DESCEND objtool
CALL scripts/atomic/check-atomics.sh
CALL scripts/checksyscalls.sh
CC kernel/irq/irqdomain.o
In file included from ./include/linux/resource_ext.h:11:0,
from ./include/linux/acpi.h:14,
from kernel/irq/irqdomain.c:5:
In function ‘kmalloc_node’,
inlined from ‘kzalloc_node.constprop’ at ./include/linux/slab.h:743:9,
inlined from ‘__irq_domain_add’ at kernel/irq/irqdomain.c:153:9:
./include/linux/slab.h:618:9: warning: argument 1 value ‘18446744073709551615’ exceeds maximum object size 9223372036854775807 [-Walloc-size-larger-than=]
return __kmalloc_node(size, flags, node);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/linux/slab.h: In function ‘__irq_domain_add’:
./include/linux/slab.h:455:7: note: in a call to allocation function ‘__kmalloc_node’ declared here
void *__kmalloc_node(size_t size, gfp_t flags, int node) __assume_slab_alignment __malloc;
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Thanks,
Bixuan Cui