Re: [RFC 02/16] KVM: selftests: add hooks for managing encrypted guest memory

[Paolo Bonzini]

On 21/10/21 05:37, Michael Roth wrote:
> > Do we have to make a copy for the sparsebit? Why not just return the
> > pointer? By looking at your subsequent patches, I find that this data
> > structure seems to be just read-only?
> Yes, it's only intended to be used for read access. But I'll if I can
> enforce that without the need to use a copy.

Return it as a const pointer?

Paolo