Re: Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix implicit type conversion

From: Jiasheng Jiang
Date: Mon Oct 25 2021 - 06:00:50 EST


On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 08:57:31AM +0000, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> The variable 'n' is defined as ULONG. However in the cpumask_next(),
>> it is used as INT.
>> That is vulnerable and may cause overflow.
>> Therefore, it might be better to define 'n' as INT.

>-ENOPARSE

I don't understand the 'ENOPARSE'.
Please give me more details.