Re: Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix implicit type conversion

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 10:00:00AM +0000, Jiasheng Jiang wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 08:57:31AM +0000, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >> The variable 'n' is defined as ULONG. However in the cpumask_next(),
> >> it is used as INT.
> >> That is vulnerable and may cause overflow.
> >> Therefore, it might be better to define 'n' as INT.
> 
> >-ENOPARSE
> 
> I don't understand the 'ENOPARSE'.
> Please give me more details.

I've no idea what your changelog is trying to say, or how your patch
makes a difference.