Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] crypto: use SM3 instead of SM3_256

[Jarkko Sakkinen]

On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 03:56:25PM +0800, Tianjia Zhang wrote:
> According to https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-oscca-cfrg-sm3-01.html,
> SM3 always produces a 256-bit hash value and there are no plans for
> other length development, so there is no ambiguity in the name of sm3.
> 
> Suggested-by: James Bottomley <jejb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Tianjia Zhang <tianjia.zhang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

The commit message does not contain a description of what kind of code
change you're doing.

/Jarkko