Re: [PATCH] media: ir-rx51: Switch to atomic PWM API

[Maíra Canal]

Hello Uwe,

> Doing this here introduces a change in behaviour. Better do this after
> pwm_get().

I didn't really get this feedback. Isn't pwm_init_state after pwm_get?
Or should it be before the error treatment of pwm_get?

> Conceptually this last hunk belongs in a separate patch. And you don't
> need to repeat PTR_ERR(pwm), as dev_err_probe already emits this
> information. So
>
>         return dev_err_probe(&dev->dev, PTR_ERR(pwm), "pwm_get failed\n");
>
> should be fine.

Thank you for the suggestion! I will fix it on v2.

Maíra