On 11/1/21 10:34 AM, Leonard Crestez wrote:
Extending these flags using the existing (1 << x) pattern triggers
complaints from checkpatch.
Instead of ignoring checkpatch modify the existing values to use BIT(x)
style in a separate commit.
Signed-off-by: Leonard Crestez <cdleonard@xxxxxxxxx>
---
net/ipv4/tcp_output.c | 14 +++++++-------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
This one could be sent outside of this patch set since you are not
adding new values. Patch sets > 20 are generally frowned upon; sending
this one separately helps get the number down.