Re: drivers/vdpa/vdpa.c:296 vdpa_mgmtdev_fill() warn: should '(((1))) << (mdev->id_table[i]->device)' be a 64 bit type?

[Joe Perches]

On Thu, 2021-11-25 at 11:15 -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 10:03:28AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > tree:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
> > head:   5d9f4cf36721aba199975a9be7863a3ff5cd4b59
> > commit: 33b347503f014ebf76257327cbc7001c6b721956 vdpa: Define vdpa mgmt device, ops and a netlink interface
> > config: i386-randconfig-m021-20211118 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20211125/202111250317.VUsGtdox-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/config)
> > compiler: gcc-9 (Debian 9.3.0-22) 9.3.0
> > 
> > If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
> > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > smatch warnings:
> > drivers/vdpa/vdpa.c:296 vdpa_mgmtdev_fill() warn: should '(((1))) << (mdev->id_table[i]->device)' be a 64 bit type?
> > 
> > vim +296 drivers/vdpa/vdpa.c
> > 
> > 33b347503f014eb Parav Pandit 2021-01-05  280  static int vdpa_mgmtdev_fill(const struct vdpa_mgmt_dev *mdev, struct sk_buff *msg,
> > 33b347503f014eb Parav Pandit 2021-01-05  281  			     u32 portid, u32 seq, int flags)
> > 33b347503f014eb Parav Pandit 2021-01-05  282  {
> > 33b347503f014eb Parav Pandit 2021-01-05  283  	u64 supported_classes = 0;
> >                                                 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > This is a u64
> > 
> > 33b347503f014eb Parav Pandit 2021-01-05  284  	void *hdr;
> > 33b347503f014eb Parav Pandit 2021-01-05  285  	int i = 0;
> > 33b347503f014eb Parav Pandit 2021-01-05  286  	int err;
> > 33b347503f014eb Parav Pandit 2021-01-05  287  
> > 33b347503f014eb Parav Pandit 2021-01-05  288  	hdr = genlmsg_put(msg, portid, seq, &vdpa_nl_family, flags, VDPA_CMD_MGMTDEV_NEW);
> > 33b347503f014eb Parav Pandit 2021-01-05  289  	if (!hdr)
> > 33b347503f014eb Parav Pandit 2021-01-05  290  		return -EMSGSIZE;
> > 33b347503f014eb Parav Pandit 2021-01-05  291  	err = vdpa_nl_mgmtdev_handle_fill(msg, mdev);
> > 33b347503f014eb Parav Pandit 2021-01-05  292  	if (err)
> > 33b347503f014eb Parav Pandit 2021-01-05  293  		goto msg_err;
> > 33b347503f014eb Parav Pandit 2021-01-05  294  
> > 33b347503f014eb Parav Pandit 2021-01-05  295  	while (mdev->id_table[i].device) {
> > 33b347503f014eb Parav Pandit 2021-01-05 @296  		supported_classes |= BIT(mdev->id_table[i].device);
> > 
> > Which suggests that this should be BIT_ULL().

True but it seems all of these tables have only 1 or
at most 3 non-null terminated entries.

It looks as if mdev->id_table itself could be NULL though:

drivers/vdpa/virtio_pci/vp_vdpa.c:      .id_table       = NULL, /* only dynamic ids */

which _might_ cause a null dereference.  Dunno if that's possible.