Re: [PATCH] pata_falcon: Add missing __iomem annotations

[Finn Thain]

On Thu, 25 Nov 2021, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:

> 
> Yeah, you do have to be careful with macros that derive a size from the 
> type of the passed data.  The *{in,out}sw() functions do not suffer from 
> that: they are defined to operate on a 16-bit I/O register. It is very 
> unlikely these semantics will ever change.
> 
> Here I'm more worried about the other danger: keeping casts will silence 
> any warning that may be introduced in a future change to the driver 
> code.
> 

Fair enough. I'll send v2.