[syzbot] inconsistent lock state in io_poll_remove_all

From: syzbot
Date: Fri Nov 26 2021 - 04:29:25 EST

Next message: Samuel Zou: "Re: [PATCH 5.4 000/100] 5.4.162-rc2 review"
Previous message: Billy Tsai: "Re: [v12 2/2] pwm: Add Aspeed ast2600 PWM support"
Next in thread: Jens Axboe: "Re: [syzbot] inconsistent lock state in io_poll_remove_all"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hello,

syzbot found the following issue on:

HEAD commit: a4849f6000e2 Merge tag 'drm-fixes-2021-11-26' of git://ano..
git tree: upstream
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=11162e9ab00000
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=bf85c53718a1e697
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=51ce8887cdef77c9ac83
compiler: gcc (Debian 10.2.1-6) 10.2.1 20210110, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.35.2

Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this issue yet.

IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+51ce8887cdef77c9ac83@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

================================
WARNING: inconsistent lock state
5.16.0-rc2-syzkaller #0 Not tainted
--------------------------------
inconsistent {IN-HARDIRQ-W} -> {HARDIRQ-ON-W} usage.
syz-executor.1/11092 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE0:SE1] takes:
ffff88801b935418 (&ctx->timeout_lock){?.-.}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock.h:374 [inline]
ffff88801b935418 (&ctx->timeout_lock){?.-.}-{2:2}, at: io_poll_remove_all+0x50/0x235 fs/io_uring.c:5702
{IN-HARDIRQ-W} state was registered at:
lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5637 [inline]
lock_acquire+0x1ab/0x510 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5602
__raw_spin_lock_irqsave include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:110 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x39/0x50 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:162
io_timeout_fn+0x6f/0x360 fs/io_uring.c:5943
__run_hrtimer kernel/time/hrtimer.c:1685 [inline]
__hrtimer_run_queues+0x609/0xe50 kernel/time/hrtimer.c:1749
hrtimer_interrupt+0x31c/0x790 kernel/time/hrtimer.c:1811
local_apic_timer_interrupt arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:1086 [inline]
__sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x146/0x530 arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:1103
sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x40/0xc0 arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:1097
asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x12/0x20 arch/x86/include/asm/idtentry.h:638
irq event stamp: 11828
hardirqs last enabled at (11827): [<ffffffff8946c35f>] __raw_spin_unlock_irq include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:159 [inline]
hardirqs last enabled at (11827): [<ffffffff8946c35f>] _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x1f/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:202
hardirqs last disabled at (11828): [<ffffffff8946c131>] __raw_spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:117 [inline]
hardirqs last disabled at (11828): [<ffffffff8946c131>] _raw_spin_lock_irq+0x41/0x50 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:170
softirqs last enabled at (11674): [<ffffffff87dfd0bc>] read_pnet include/net/net_namespace.h:327 [inline]
softirqs last enabled at (11674): [<ffffffff87dfd0bc>] sock_net include/net/sock.h:2658 [inline]
softirqs last enabled at (11674): [<ffffffff87dfd0bc>] unix_create1+0x47c/0x5c0 net/unix/af_unix.c:893
softirqs last disabled at (11672): [<ffffffff87dfd039>] unix_sockets_unbound net/unix/af_unix.c:134 [inline]
softirqs last disabled at (11672): [<ffffffff87dfd039>] unix_create1+0x3f9/0x5c0 net/unix/af_unix.c:890

other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:

CPU0
----
lock(&ctx->timeout_lock);
<Interrupt>
lock(&ctx->timeout_lock);

*** DEADLOCK ***

2 locks held by syz-executor.1/11092:
#0: ffff88801b9353d8 (&ctx->completion_lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:349 [inline]
#0: ffff88801b9353d8 (&ctx->completion_lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: io_poll_remove_all+0x48/0x235 fs/io_uring.c:5701
#1: ffff88801b935418 (&ctx->timeout_lock){?.-.}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock.h:374 [inline]
#1: ffff88801b935418 (&ctx->timeout_lock){?.-.}-{2:2}, at: io_poll_remove_all+0x50/0x235 fs/io_uring.c:5702

stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 PID: 11092 Comm: syz-executor.1 Not tainted 5.16.0-rc2-syzkaller #0
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.14.0-2 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0xcd/0x134 lib/dump_stack.c:106
print_usage_bug kernel/locking/lockdep.c:203 [inline]
valid_state kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3945 [inline]
mark_lock_irq kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4148 [inline]
mark_lock.cold+0x61/0x8e kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4605
mark_held_locks+0x9f/0xe0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4206
__trace_hardirqs_on_caller kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4224 [inline]
lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4292 [inline]
lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x135/0x400 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4244
trace_hardirqs_on+0x5b/0x1c0 kernel/trace/trace_preemptirq.c:49
__raw_spin_unlock_irq include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:159 [inline]
_raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x1f/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:202
spin_unlock_irq include/linux/spinlock.h:399 [inline]
__io_poll_remove_one fs/io_uring.c:5669 [inline]
__io_poll_remove_one fs/io_uring.c:5654 [inline]
io_poll_remove_one+0x236/0x870 fs/io_uring.c:5680
io_poll_remove_all+0x1af/0x235 fs/io_uring.c:5709
io_uring_try_cancel_requests+0x66d/0x717 fs/io_uring.c:9668
io_uring_cancel_generic+0x3b8/0x690 fs/io_uring.c:9833
io_uring_files_cancel include/linux/io_uring.h:16 [inline]
do_exit+0x60c/0x2b40 kernel/exit.c:787
do_group_exit+0x125/0x310 kernel/exit.c:929
get_signal+0x47d/0x2220 kernel/signal.c:2852
arch_do_signal_or_restart+0x2a9/0x1c40 arch/x86/kernel/signal.c:868
handle_signal_work kernel/entry/common.c:148 [inline]
exit_to_user_mode_loop kernel/entry/common.c:172 [inline]
exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x17d/0x290 kernel/entry/common.c:207
__syscall_exit_to_user_mode_work kernel/entry/common.c:289 [inline]
syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x19/0x60 kernel/entry/common.c:300
do_syscall_64+0x42/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:86
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
RIP: 0033:0x7fbfcc7f1ae9
Code: ff ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 40 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 bc ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007fbfc9d67218 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000ca
RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 00007fbfcc904f68 RCX: 00007fbfcc7f1ae9
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000080 RDI: 00007fbfcc904f68
RBP: 00007fbfcc904f60 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007fbfcc904f6c
R13: 00007ffd26cc528f R14: 00007fbfc9d67300 R15: 0000000000022000
</TASK>

---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.

syzbot will keep track of this issue. See:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.

Next message: Samuel Zou: "Re: [PATCH 5.4 000/100] 5.4.162-rc2 review"
Previous message: Billy Tsai: "Re: [v12 2/2] pwm: Add Aspeed ast2600 PWM support"
Next in thread: Jens Axboe: "Re: [syzbot] inconsistent lock state in io_poll_remove_all"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]