Re: [ramfs] 0858d7da8a: canonical_address#:#[##]

[Kari Argillander]

On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 09:54:56AM +0800, yangerkun wrote:
> Cc ntfs3:
> 
> Maybe it's a problem like this:
> 
> do_new_mount
>   fs_context_for_mount
>     alloc_fs_context
>       ntfs_init_fs_context
>         sbi = kzalloc(sizeof(struct ntfs_sb_info), GFP_NOFS);
>         fc->s_fs_info = sbi;
>   vfs_get_tree
>     ntfs_fs_get_tree
>       get_tree_bdev
>         blkdev_get_by_path  // return error and sbi->sb will be NULL
>   put_fs_context
>     ntfs_fs_free
>       put_ntfs
>         ntfs_update_mftmirr
>           struct super_block *sb = sbi->sb; // NULL
>           u32 blocksize = sb->s_blocksize; // BOOM
> 
> It's actually a ntfs3 bug which may be introduced by:
> 
> 610f8f5a7baf fs/ntfs3: Use new api for mounting

Yeap. Thank you very much. Will send patch for this in within 24h.

> On 2021/11/26 2:03, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 6:08 AM kernel test robot <oliver.sang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > FYI, we noticed the following commit (built with clang-14):
> > > 
> > > commit: 0858d7da8a09e440fb192a0239d20249a2d16af8 ("ramfs: fix mount source show for ramfs")
> > 
> > Funky. That commit seems to have nothing to do with the oops:
> > 
> > > [  806.257788][  T204] /dev/root: Can't open blockdev
> > > [  806.259101][  T204] general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc0000000003: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN
> > > [  806.263082][  T204] KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000018-0x000000000000001f]
> > 
> > Not a very helpful error message,a nd the KASAN comment makes little sense, but
> > 
> > > [ 806.267540][ T204] RIP: 0010:ntfs_update_mftmirr (kbuild/src/consumer/fs/ntfs3/fsntfs.c:834)
> > 
> > That's
> > 
> >          u32 blocksize = sb->s_blocksize;
> > 
> > and presumably with KASAN you end up getting hat odd 0xdffffc0000000003 thing.
> > 
> > Anyway, looks like sb is NULL, and the code is
> > 
> >    int ntfs_update_mftmirr(struct ntfs_sb_info *sbi, int wait)
> >    {
> >          int err;
> >          struct super_block *sb = sbi->sb;
> >          u32 blocksize = sb->s_blocksize;
> >          sector_t block1, block2;
> > 
> > although I have no idea how sbi->sb could be NULL.
> > 
> > Konstantin? See
> > 
> >      https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20211125140816.GC3109@xsang-OptiPlex-9020/
> > 
> > for the full thing.
> > 
> >               Linus
> > .
> >