[PATCH 5.10 025/121] fuse: release pipe buf after last use

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

From: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@xxxxxxxxxx>

commit 473441720c8616dfaf4451f9c7ea14f0eb5e5d65 upstream.

Checking buf->flags should be done before the pipe_buf_release() is called
on the pipe buffer, since releasing the buffer might modify the flags.

This is exactly what page_cache_pipe_buf_release() does, and which results
in the same VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageLRU(page)) that the original patch was
trying to fix.

Reported-by: Justin Forbes <jmforbes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Fixes: 712a951025c0 ("fuse: fix page stealing")
Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # v2.6.35
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 fs/fuse/dev.c |   10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/fuse/dev.c
+++ b/fs/fuse/dev.c
@@ -851,17 +851,17 @@ static int fuse_try_move_page(struct fus
 		goto out_put_old;
 	}
 
+	get_page(newpage);
+
+	if (!(buf->flags & PIPE_BUF_FLAG_LRU))
+		lru_cache_add(newpage);
+
 	/*
 	 * Release while we have extra ref on stolen page.  Otherwise
 	 * anon_pipe_buf_release() might think the page can be reused.
 	 */
 	pipe_buf_release(cs->pipe, buf);
 
-	get_page(newpage);
-
-	if (!(buf->flags & PIPE_BUF_FLAG_LRU))
-		lru_cache_add(newpage);
-
 	err = 0;
 	spin_lock(&cs->req->waitq.lock);
 	if (test_bit(FR_ABORTED, &cs->req->flags))