Re: [PATCH Part2 v5 00/45] Add AMD Secure Nested Paging (SEV-SNP) Hypervisor Support

[Vlastimil Babka]

On 11/29/21 17:13, Brijesh Singh wrote:
>>
>> That could work for the kmap() context.
>> What to do for the userspace context (host userspace)?
>> - shared->private transition - page has to be unmapped from all userspace,
>> elevated refcount (gup() in progress) can block this unmap until it goes
>> away - could be doable
> 
> An unmap of the page from all the userspace process during the page state
> transition will be great. If we can somehow store the state information in
> the 'struct page' then it can be later used to make better decision. I am
> not sure that relying on the elevated refcount is the correct approach. e.g
> in the case of encrypted guests, the HV may pin the page to prevent it from
> migration.
> 
> Thoughts on how you want to approach unmaping the page from userspace page
> table?

After giving it more thought and rereading the threads here it seems I
thought it would be easier than it really is, and it would have to be
something at least like Kirill's hwpoison based approach.

>> - still, what to do if host userspace then tries to access the unmapped
>> page? SIGSEGV instead of SIGBUS and it can recover?
>>
> 
> Yes, SIGSEGV makes sense to me.

OTOH the newer fd-based proposal also IIUC takes care of this part better -
the host userspace controls the guest's shared->private conversion requests
so it can't be tricked to access a page that's changed under it.

>>
>>
>>> Thoughts ?
>>>
>>>>
>>>> This should turn an RMP fault in the kernel which is not covered in the
>>>> uaccess exception table into a fatal error.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>