Re: [PATCH net] net: ocelot: Fix the call to switchdev_bridge_port_offload

[Vladimir Oltean]

On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 01:53:00PM +0100, Horatiu Vultur wrote:
> In the blamed commit, the call to the function
> switchdev_bridge_port_offload was passing the wrong argument for
> atomic_nb. It was ocelot_netdevice_nb instead of ocelot_swtchdev_nb.
> This patch fixes this issue.
> 
> Fixes: 4e51bf44a03af6 ("net: bridge: move the switchdev object replay helpers to "push" mode")
> Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_net.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_net.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_net.c
> index 8115c3db252e..e271b6225b72 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_net.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_net.c
> @@ -1187,7 +1187,7 @@ static int ocelot_netdevice_bridge_join(struct net_device *dev,
>  	ocelot_port_bridge_join(ocelot, port, bridge);
>  
>  	err = switchdev_bridge_port_offload(brport_dev, dev, priv,
> -					    &ocelot_netdevice_nb,
> +					    &ocelot_switchdev_nb,
>  					    &ocelot_switchdev_blocking_nb,
>  					    false, extack);
>  	if (err)
> @@ -1201,7 +1201,7 @@ static int ocelot_netdevice_bridge_join(struct net_device *dev,
>  
>  err_switchdev_sync:
>  	switchdev_bridge_port_unoffload(brport_dev, priv,
> -					&ocelot_netdevice_nb,
> +					&ocelot_switchdev_nb,
>  					&ocelot_switchdev_blocking_nb);
>  err_switchdev_offload:
>  	ocelot_port_bridge_leave(ocelot, port, bridge);
> @@ -1214,7 +1214,7 @@ static void ocelot_netdevice_pre_bridge_leave(struct net_device *dev,
>  	struct ocelot_port_private *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
>  
>  	switchdev_bridge_port_unoffload(brport_dev, priv,
> -					&ocelot_netdevice_nb,
> +					&ocelot_switchdev_nb,
>  					&ocelot_switchdev_blocking_nb);
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 2.33.0
>

Oh my... I remember noticing this issue when preparing those patches,
and also noticed that ocelot doesn't implement SWITCHDEV_FDB_{ADD,DEL}_TO_DEVICE
anyway. So I wanted to pass NULL anyway. I don't know what happened,
I must have made the fixup on a branch which wasn't the branch that I posted.
Anyway.

Reviewed-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@xxxxxxx>