Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the fscrypt tree

[Eric Biggers]

On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 12:11:39PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the block tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   fs/iomap/direct-io.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   489734ef94f4 ("iomap: support direct I/O with fscrypt using blk-crypto")
> 
> from the fscrypt tree and commit:
> 
>   07888c665b40 ("block: pass a block_device and opf to bio_alloc")
> 
> from the block tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (I think - see below) and can carry the fix as necessary.
> This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
> 

Looks fine to me, thanks.

- Eric