[PATCH 4/4] arm64: dts: qcom: sdm630: order interrupts according to bindings

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

The CAMSS DTSI device node, which came after the bindings were merged,
got the interrupts ordered differently then specified in the bindings:

  sdm630-sony-xperia-nile-pioneer.dtb: camss@ca00000: interrupt-names:0: 'csid0' was expected

Reordering them to match bindings should not cause ABI issues, because
the driver relies on names, not ordering.

Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm630.dtsi | 16 ++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm630.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm630.dtsi
index 594a802e9429..2c540476a8be 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm630.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm630.dtsi
@@ -1870,23 +1870,23 @@ camss: camss@ca00000 {
 				    "ispif",
 				    "vfe0",
 				    "vfe1";
-			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 78 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
-				     <GIC_SPI 79 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
-				     <GIC_SPI 80 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
-				     <GIC_SPI 296 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
+			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 296 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
 				     <GIC_SPI 297 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
 				     <GIC_SPI 298 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
 				     <GIC_SPI 299 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
+				     <GIC_SPI 78 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
+				     <GIC_SPI 79 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
+				     <GIC_SPI 80 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
 				     <GIC_SPI 309 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
 				     <GIC_SPI 314 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
 				     <GIC_SPI 315 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
-			interrupt-names = "csiphy0",
-					  "csiphy1",
-					  "csiphy2",
-					  "csid0",
+			interrupt-names = "csid0",
 					  "csid1",
 					  "csid2",
 					  "csid3",
+					  "csiphy0",
+					  "csiphy1",
+					  "csiphy2",
 					  "ispif",
 					  "vfe0",
 					  "vfe1";
-- 
2.32.0