Re: [RFC] sched,livepatch: call stop_one_cpu in klp_check_and_switch_task

From: Song Liu
Date: Mon May 09 2022 - 12:28:42 EST




> On May 9, 2022, at 8:52 AM, Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> After talking with Peter, this seems like it might be a potential approach
> to fix the issue for kernels both with PREEMPT enabled and disabled.
>
> If this looks like a reasonable approach to people, we can run experiments
> with this patch on a few thousand systems, and compare it with the kernel
> live patch transition latencies (and number of failures) on a kernel without
> that patch.
>
> Does this look like an approach that could work?

Hi Petr,

IIUC, this is similar to you proposal. Could you please share your thoughts
on this?

Thanks,
Song


>
> ---8<---
> sched,livepatch: call stop_one_cpu in klp_check_and_switch_task
>
> If a running task fails to transition to the new kernel live patch after the
> first attempt, use the stopper thread to preempt it during subsequent attempts
> at switching to the new kernel live patch.
>
> <INSERT EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS HERE>
>
> Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> diff --git a/kernel/livepatch/transition.c b/kernel/livepatch/transition.c
> index 5d03a2ad1066..26e9e5f09822 100644
> --- a/kernel/livepatch/transition.c
> +++ b/kernel/livepatch/transition.c
> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
>
> #include <linux/cpu.h>
> #include <linux/stacktrace.h>
> +#include <linux/stop_machine.h>
> #include "core.h"
> #include "patch.h"
> #include "transition.h"
> @@ -281,6 +282,11 @@ static int klp_check_and_switch_task(struct task_struct *task, void *arg)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static int kpatch_dummy_fn(void *dummy)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Try to safely switch a task to the target patch state. If it's currently
> * running, or it's sleeping on a to-be-patched or to-be-unpatched function, or
> @@ -315,6 +321,9 @@ static bool klp_try_switch_task(struct task_struct *task)
> case -EBUSY: /* klp_check_and_switch_task() */
> pr_debug("%s: %s:%d is running\n",
> __func__, task->comm, task->pid);
> + /* Preempt the task from the second KLP switch attempt. */
> + if (klp_signals_cnt)
> + stop_one_cpu(task_cpu(task), kpatch_dummy_fn, NULL);
> break;
> case -EINVAL: /* klp_check_and_switch_task() */
> pr_debug("%s: %s:%d has an unreliable stack\n",
>