Re: [PATCH v1] module: Fix prefix for module.sig_enforce module param

From: Linus Torvalds
Date: Thu Jun 02 2022 - 15:46:26 EST

Next message: Catalin Marinas: "Re: [PATCH] arm64: Initialize jump labels before setup_machine_fdt()"
Previous message: Jason A. Donenfeld: "Re: [PATCH] arm64: Initialize jump labels before setup_machine_fdt()"
In reply to: Luis Chamberlain: "Re: [PATCH v1] module: Fix prefix for module.sig_enforce module param"
Next in thread: Saravana Kannan: "Re: [PATCH v1] module: Fix prefix for module.sig_enforce module param"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Thu, Jun 2, 2022 at 12:16 PM Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Linus want to take this in or should I just queue these up?

I'll take it, and remove the unnecessary #ifdef/#endif. The #undef
might as well be unconditional - simpler and doesn't hurt.

Linus

Next message: Catalin Marinas: "Re: [PATCH] arm64: Initialize jump labels before setup_machine_fdt()"
Previous message: Jason A. Donenfeld: "Re: [PATCH] arm64: Initialize jump labels before setup_machine_fdt()"
In reply to: Luis Chamberlain: "Re: [PATCH v1] module: Fix prefix for module.sig_enforce module param"
Next in thread: Saravana Kannan: "Re: [PATCH v1] module: Fix prefix for module.sig_enforce module param"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]