On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 10:27 AM John Garry <john.garry@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Sure,
On 27/06/2022 03:57, Ian Rogers wrote:
A challenge with this code is in avoiding regressions. For this reason
the jevents.py produces identical output to jevents.c, validated with a
test script and build target.
v6. Adds Tested-by from Zhengjun Xing<zhengjun.xing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
and Thomas Richter<tmricht@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>. Fixes issues spotted
by Jiri Olsa<jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx>, jsmn.c wasn't deleted and the
empty pmu-events.c didn't pass the pmu-events test. It also adds a
missing mkdir which is necessary before creating pmu-events.c and
tweaks the quiet display code in the empty case to display a gen.
v5. Adds a 2>/dev/null as suggested by David Laight
Hmmm... shouldn't this be v7? Anyway what I got with message-id
20220627025744.106527-1-irogers@xxxxxxxxxx now seems to build and the
output looks ok.
Thanks,
John
Thanks John, I think I've confused myself by working on greater than 1
machine wrt version numbers. I can re-send as v7, would it be okay to
put on a Tested-by: John Garry <john.garry@xxxxxxxxxx> ?
.