Re: [PATCH] ASoC: Intel: kbl_rt5663_max98927: Simplify clk_get() usage

[Mark Brown]

On Sun, Aug 07, 2022 at 10:18:54PM +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> If clk_get() returns -ENOENT, there is no need to defer the driver, -ENOENT
> will be returned the same for each retries.
> So, return the error code directly instead of -EPROBE_DEFER.

Are you *sure* that this is the case on Intel platforms where we don't
have a full firmware description for clocks and therefore can't identify
cases where we expect a clock to at some point to become available.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature