Re: [Phishing Risk] Re: [Phishing Risk] Re: [Phishing Risk] [External] Re: [PATCH] cgroup/cpuset: Add a new isolated mems.policy type.

[Zhongkun He]

Hi Tejun,
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, Sep 07, 2022 at 08:06:30PM +0800, Zhongkun He wrote:
> > It would be better if one process had a way to dynamically modify the
> > mempolicy of another process. But unfortunately there is no interface or
> > system call to do that in userspace.
>
> If you need to change the properties dynamically, I suggest adding this as a
> dynamic per-process interface first. That's more generic and useful for more
> cases.
>
> Thanks.

Got it, thanks for your suggestion and reply.