Re: [PATCH v2 01/39] Documentation/x86: Add CET description

[Dave Hansen]

On 10/3/22 12:35, John Hubbard wrote:
> It's always a judgment call, as to whether to use something like ``CALL`
> or just plain CALL. Here, I'd like to opine that that the benefits of
> ``CALL`` are very small, whereas plain text in cet.rst has been made
> significantly worse. So the result is, "this is not worth it".

I'm definitely in this camp as well.  Unless the markup *really* adds to
readability, just leave it alone.