Re: [PATCH v2 01/39] Documentation/x86: Add CET description

[Bagas Sanjaya]

On 10/4/22 02:35, John Hubbard wrote:
> It's always a judgment call, as to whether to use something like ``CALL`
> or just plain CALL. Here, I'd like to opine that that the benefits of
> ``CALL`` are very small, whereas plain text in cet.rst has been made
> significantly worse. So the result is, "this is not worth it".
> 

Hmm, seems like neither CALL nor ``CALL`` is better, right?

-- 
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara