On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 05:42:37PM +0800, Xianting Tian wrote:
在 2022/8/12 上午12:17, Palmer Dabbelt 写道:357628e68f5c ("RISC-V: kexec: Fixup use of smp_processor_id() in preemptible context"
On Thu, 11 Aug 2022 00:41:44 PDT (-0700),Hi Palmer
xianting.tian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
I ever sent the patch 1 in the link:Thank. I've taken the first 4 onto for-next, which is still targeted
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-riscv/patch/20220708073150.352830-3-xianting.tian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
And patch 2,3 in the link:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-riscv/patch/20220714113300.367854-2-xianting.tian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-riscv/patch/20220714113300.367854-3-xianting.tian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
This patch set just put these patches together, and with three new
patch 4, 5, 6.
these six patches are the fixups for machine_kexec, kernel mode PC
for vmcore
and improvements for vmcoreinfo, memory layout dump and fixup
schedule out issue
in machine_crash_shutdown().
The main changes in the six patchs as below,
Patch 1: Fixup use of smp_processor_id() in preemptible context, to
cleanup
the console prints.
Patch 2: Fixup to get correct kernel mode PC for kernel mode regs
for vmcore.
Patch 3: Fixup schedule out issue in machine_crash_shutdown()
Patch 4: Add modules to virtual kernel memory layout dump.
Patch 5: Add VM layout, va bits, ram base to vmcoreinfo, which can
simplify
the development of crash tool as ARM64 already did
(arch/arm64/kernel/crash_core.c).
Patch 6: Updates vmcoreinfo.rst for vmcoreinfo export for RISCV64.
With these six patches(patch 2 is must), crash tool can work well to
analyze
a vmcore. The patches for crash tool for RISCV64 is in the link:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20220801043040.2003264-1-xianting.tian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
------
Changes v1 -> v2:
1, remove the patch "Add a fast call path of crash_kexec()" from
this series
of patches, as it already applied to riscv git.
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/riscv/linux.git/commit/?h=for-next&id=3f1901110a89b0e2e13adb2ac8d1a7102879ea98
2, add 'Reviewed-by' based on the comments of v1.
Changes v2 -> v3:
use "riscv" instead of "riscv64" in patch 5 subject line.
Changes v3 -> v4:
use "riscv" instead of "riscv64" in the summary of patch 5 subject
line.
Changes v4 -> v5:
add a new patch "RISC-V: Fixup schedule out issue in
machine_crash_shutdown()"
Changes v5 -> v6:
1, move "fixup" patches to the start of the patch set.
2, change patch 1, 2, 6's subject to make it tell more what it's
about.
3, add Fixes for patch 3.
4, adjuest the changes format for patch 6.
Xianting Tian (6):
RISC-V: kexec: Fixup use of smp_processor_id() in preemptible context
RISC-V: Fixup get incorrect user mode PC for kernel mode regs
RISC-V: Fixup schedule out issue in machine_crash_shutdown()
RISC-V: Add modules to virtual kernel memory layout dump
RISC-V: Add arch_crash_save_vmcoreinfo support
Documentation: kdump: describe VMCOREINFO export for RISCV64
.../admin-guide/kdump/vmcoreinfo.rst | 31 +++++++++++++++++++
arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile | 1 +
arch/riscv/kernel/crash_core.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++
arch/riscv/kernel/crash_save_regs.S | 2 +-
arch/riscv/kernel/machine_kexec.c | 28 ++++++++++++++---
arch/riscv/mm/init.c | 4 +++
6 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 arch/riscv/kernel/crash_core.c
for 5.20, as they're fixes. I'm not opposed to taking the documentation
patch for this cycle as well, it just needs some going-over as the
wording looks very odd (or at least it does to me right now, maybe I'm
just still half asleep). Patch 5 is a new feature, and given that it's
being spun during the merge window it's too late.
Do you plan to merge the two patch to Linux 6.1 to support crash tool work?
thanks
RISC-V: kexec: Fixup use of smp_processor_id() in preemptible context
RISC-V: Fixup get incorrect user mode PC for kernel mode regs59c026c359c3 ("RISC-V: Fixup get incorrect user mode PC for kernel mode regs")
Hey Xianting, those two commits already seem to have been applied, do
you perhaps instead mean the documentation patch and the addition of
support for arch_crash_save_vmcoreinfo? I recalled asking if you needed
to respin at the time, but do not see a response:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/39fdc85e-b2d5-863c-4878-4b3380d76bc4@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/
IIRC Bagas had some outstanding comments on the documentation change
too. Was I incorrect?
Thanks,
Conor.