Re: [PATCH V6 0/6] RISC-V fixups to work with crash tool
From: Conor Dooley
Date: Thu Oct 13 2022 - 01:25:04 EST
On 13 October 2022 03:28:09 IST, Xianting Tian <xianting.tian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>在 2022/10/12 下午5:52, Conor Dooley 写道:
>> On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 05:42:37PM +0800, Xianting Tian wrote:
>>> 在 2022/8/12 上午12:17, Palmer Dabbelt 写道:
>>>> On Thu, 11 Aug 2022 00:41:44 PDT (-0700),
>>>> xianting.tian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>>>> I ever sent the patch 1 in the link:
>>>>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-riscv/patch/20220708073150.352830-3-xianting.tian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
>>>>>
>>>>> And patch 2,3 in the link:
>>>>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-riscv/patch/20220714113300.367854-2-xianting.tian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
>>>>>
>>>>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-riscv/patch/20220714113300.367854-3-xianting.tian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> This patch set just put these patches together, and with three new
>>>>> patch 4, 5, 6.
>>>>> these six patches are the fixups for machine_kexec, kernel mode PC
>>>>> for vmcore
>>>>> and improvements for vmcoreinfo, memory layout dump and fixup
>>>>> schedule out issue
>>>>> in machine_crash_shutdown().
>>>>>
>>>>> The main changes in the six patchs as below,
>>>>> Patch 1: Fixup use of smp_processor_id() in preemptible context, to
>>>>> cleanup
>>>>> the console prints.
>>>>> Patch 2: Fixup to get correct kernel mode PC for kernel mode regs
>>>>> for vmcore.
>>>>> Patch 3: Fixup schedule out issue in machine_crash_shutdown()
>>>>> Patch 4: Add modules to virtual kernel memory layout dump.
>>>>> Patch 5: Add VM layout, va bits, ram base to vmcoreinfo, which can
>>>>> simplify
>>>>> the development of crash tool as ARM64 already did
>>>>> (arch/arm64/kernel/crash_core.c).
>>>>> Patch 6: Updates vmcoreinfo.rst for vmcoreinfo export for RISCV64.
>>>>>
>>>>> With these six patches(patch 2 is must), crash tool can work well to
>>>>> analyze
>>>>> a vmcore. The patches for crash tool for RISCV64 is in the link:
>>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20220801043040.2003264-1-xianting.tian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ------
>>>>> Changes v1 -> v2:
>>>>> 1, remove the patch "Add a fast call path of crash_kexec()" from
>>>>> this series
>>>>> of patches, as it already applied to riscv git.
>>>>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/riscv/linux.git/commit/?h=for-next&id=3f1901110a89b0e2e13adb2ac8d1a7102879ea98
>>>>> 2, add 'Reviewed-by' based on the comments of v1.
>>>>> Changes v2 -> v3:
>>>>> use "riscv" instead of "riscv64" in patch 5 subject line.
>>>>> Changes v3 -> v4:
>>>>> use "riscv" instead of "riscv64" in the summary of patch 5 subject
>>>>> line.
>>>>> Changes v4 -> v5:
>>>>> add a new patch "RISC-V: Fixup schedule out issue in
>>>>> machine_crash_shutdown()"
>>>>> Changes v5 -> v6:
>>>>> 1, move "fixup" patches to the start of the patch set.
>>>>> 2, change patch 1, 2, 6's subject to make it tell more what it's
>>>>> about.
>>>>> 3, add Fixes for patch 3.
>>>>> 4, adjuest the changes format for patch 6.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Xianting Tian (6):
>>>>> RISC-V: kexec: Fixup use of smp_processor_id() in preemptible context
>>>>> RISC-V: Fixup get incorrect user mode PC for kernel mode regs
>>>>> RISC-V: Fixup schedule out issue in machine_crash_shutdown()
>>>>> RISC-V: Add modules to virtual kernel memory layout dump
>>>>> RISC-V: Add arch_crash_save_vmcoreinfo support
>>>>> Documentation: kdump: describe VMCOREINFO export for RISCV64
>>>>>
>>>>> .../admin-guide/kdump/vmcoreinfo.rst | 31 +++++++++++++++++++
>>>>> arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile | 1 +
>>>>> arch/riscv/kernel/crash_core.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++
>>>>> arch/riscv/kernel/crash_save_regs.S | 2 +-
>>>>> arch/riscv/kernel/machine_kexec.c | 28 ++++++++++++++---
>>>>> arch/riscv/mm/init.c | 4 +++
>>>>> 6 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>>> create mode 100644 arch/riscv/kernel/crash_core.c
>>>> Thank. I've taken the first 4 onto for-next, which is still targeted
>>>> for 5.20, as they're fixes. I'm not opposed to taking the documentation
>>>> patch for this cycle as well, it just needs some going-over as the
>>>> wording looks very odd (or at least it does to me right now, maybe I'm
>>>> just still half asleep). Patch 5 is a new feature, and given that it's
>>>> being spun during the merge window it's too late.
>>> Hi Palmer
>>>
>>> Do you plan to merge the two patch to Linux 6.1 to support crash tool work?
>>> thanks
>>>
>>> RISC-V: kexec: Fixup use of smp_processor_id() in preemptible context
>> 357628e68f5c ("RISC-V: kexec: Fixup use of smp_processor_id() in preemptible context"
>>
>>> RISC-V: Fixup get incorrect user mode PC for kernel mode regs
>> 59c026c359c3 ("RISC-V: Fixup get incorrect user mode PC for kernel mode regs")
>>
>> Hey Xianting, those two commits already seem to have been applied, do
>> you perhaps instead mean the documentation patch and the addition of
>> support for arch_crash_save_vmcoreinfo? I recalled asking if you needed
>> to respin at the time, but do not see a response:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/39fdc85e-b2d5-863c-4878-4b3380d76bc4@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/
>> IIRC Bagas had some outstanding comments on the documentation change
>> too. Was I incorrect?
>
>Sorry, It is the two patches:
>
> RISC-V: Add arch_crash_save_vmcoreinfo support
> Documentation: kdump: describe VMCOREINFO export for RISCV64
>
>I saw Palmer already merged the two patches to his riscv-crash branch, it means they are OK?
Dunno, but no harm in resending given it's been a while cycle since then.
>
>https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/palmer/linux.git/log/?h=riscv-crash
>
>I saw Bagas's comments, I will send new version patch for the two patches, thanks for the reminder.
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Conor.