Re: [PATCH V3 0/8] x86/topology: Improve CPUID.1F handling

From: Zhang Rui
Date: Thu Oct 13 2022 - 22:06:17 EST


Hi, Dave,

On Thu, 2022-10-13 at 08:56 -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 10/13/22 03:58, Len Brown wrote:
> > This series of BUG FIXES needs to be marked for -stable.
>
> Hi Len,
>
> That would have been great feedback to include with your review when
> your provided your acks. It's also not clear where the bug fixes
> stop
> and the "related fixes" begin. Is the entire series bug fixes that
> need
> to be marked for -stable?

Patch 4/8 ~ 5/8 are real fixes and they depends on patch 2/8 and 3/8 to
avoid possible regressions. So patch 2/8 ~ 5/8 should be stable
material.

patch 6/8 is also a bugfix, but we have not observed any functionality
issues so far.

thanks,
rui