Re: [PATCH V3 0/8] x86/topology: Improve CPUID.1F handling

[Dave Hansen]

On 10/13/22 19:06, Zhang Rui wrote:
> Patch 4/8 ~ 5/8 are real fixes and they depends on patch 2/8 and 3/8 to
> avoid possible regressions. So patch 2/8 ~ 5/8 should be stable
> material.
> 
> patch 6/8 is also a bugfix, but we have not observed any functionality
> issues so far.

If you want to make this really easy on me, you could take the changelog
and comment revisions that I made in that testing branch that I shared,
integrate them, and send it out again, and *only* include the bugfixes.