RE: [PATCH 2/4] staging: r8188eu: reformat long computation lines
From: David Laight
Date: Tue Oct 18 2022 - 07:21:37 EST
From: Greg KH
> Sent: 17 October 2022 15:10
>
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 06:52:50PM +0530, Deepak R Varma wrote:
> > Reformat long running computation instructions to improve code readability.
> > Address following checkpatch script complaints:
> > CHECK: line length of 171 exceeds 100 columns
> > CHECK: line length of 113 exceeds 100 columns
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Deepak R Varma <drv@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_br_ext.c | 20 +++++++++++++-------
> > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_br_ext.c b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_br_ext.c
> > index 79daf8f269d6..427da7e8ba4c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_br_ext.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_br_ext.c
> > @@ -211,8 +211,10 @@ static int __nat25_network_hash(unsigned char *network_addr)
> > } else if (network_addr[0] == NAT25_IPX) {
> > unsigned long x;
> >
> > - x = network_addr[1] ^ network_addr[2] ^ network_addr[3] ^ network_addr[4] ^
> network_addr[5] ^
> > - network_addr[6] ^ network_addr[7] ^ network_addr[8] ^ network_addr[9] ^
> network_addr[10];
> > + x = network_addr[1] ^ network_addr[2] ^ network_addr[3] ^
>
> Why not go out to [4] here and then you are one line shorter?
and/or use a shorter variable name....
David
-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)