Re: [PATCH 2/4] staging: r8188eu: reformat long computation lines

[Deepak R Varma]

On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 11:21:26AM +0000, David Laight wrote:
> From: Greg KH
> > Sent: 17 October 2022 15:10
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 06:52:50PM +0530, Deepak R Varma wrote:
> > > Reformat long running computation instructions to improve code readability.
> > > Address following checkpatch script complaints:
> > > 	CHECK: line length of 171 exceeds 100 columns
> > > 	CHECK: line length of 113 exceeds 100 columns
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Deepak R Varma <drv@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_br_ext.c | 20 +++++++++++++-------
> > >  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_br_ext.c b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_br_ext.c
> > > index 79daf8f269d6..427da7e8ba4c 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_br_ext.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_br_ext.c
> > > @@ -211,8 +211,10 @@ static int __nat25_network_hash(unsigned char *network_addr)
> > >  	} else if (network_addr[0] == NAT25_IPX) {
> > >  		unsigned long x;
> > >
> > > -		x = network_addr[1] ^ network_addr[2] ^ network_addr[3] ^ network_addr[4] ^
> > network_addr[5] ^
> > > -			network_addr[6] ^ network_addr[7] ^ network_addr[8] ^ network_addr[9] ^
> > network_addr[10];
> > > +		x = network_addr[1] ^ network_addr[2] ^ network_addr[3] ^
> >
> > Why not go out to [4] here and then you are one line shorter?
>
> and/or use a shorter variable name....
Hi David,
I have already re-submitted the patch set with 4 in line arrangement. Do you
still suggest using shorter variable names?

Thank you,
./drv

>
> 	David
>
> -
> Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
> Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
>
>