Re: [PATCH 2/8] mm/percpu: use list_first_entry_or_null in pcpu_reclaim_populated()

From: Dennis Zhou
Date: Mon Oct 24 2022 - 15:37:12 EST


On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 04:14:29PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> To replace list_empty()/list_first_entry() pair to simplify code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Baoquan He <bhe@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> mm/percpu.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/percpu.c b/mm/percpu.c
> index 26d8cd2ca323..a3fde4ac03a4 100644
> --- a/mm/percpu.c
> +++ b/mm/percpu.c
> @@ -2143,9 +2143,9 @@ static void pcpu_reclaim_populated(void)
> * other accessor is the free path which only returns area back to the
> * allocator not touching the populated bitmap.
> */
> - while (!list_empty(&pcpu_chunk_lists[pcpu_to_depopulate_slot])) {
> - chunk = list_first_entry(&pcpu_chunk_lists[pcpu_to_depopulate_slot],
> - struct pcpu_chunk, list);
> + while (chunk = list_first_entry_or_null(
> + &pcpu_chunk_lists[pcpu_to_depopulate_slot],
> + struct pcpu_chunk, list)) {
> WARN_ON(chunk->immutable);
>
> /*
> --
> 2.34.1
>

With added parenthesis,

Acked-by: Dennis Zhou <dennis@xxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks,
Dennis