Re: [PATCH v2 10/13] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8450: add spmi node

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 24/10/2022 12:48, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On 24/10/2022 19:46, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 24/10/2022 12:45, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>> On 24/10/2022 17:56, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>> On 09/12/2021 05:35, Vinod Koul wrote:
>>>>> Add the spmi bus as found in the SM8450 SoC
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>    arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>    1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi
>>>>> index f75de777f6ea..b80e34fd3fe1 100644
>>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi
>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi
>>>>> @@ -645,6 +645,24 @@ pdc: interrupt-controller@b220000 {
>>>>>    			interrupt-controller;
>>>>>    		};
>>>>>    
>>>>> +		spmi_bus: spmi@c42d000 {
>>>>> +			compatible = "qcom,spmi-pmic-arb";
>>>>> +			reg = <0x0 0x0c400000 0x0 0x00003000>,
>>>>> +			      <0x0 0x0c500000 0x0 0x00400000>,
>>>>> +			      <0x0 0x0c440000 0x0 0x00080000>,
>>>>> +			      <0x0 0x0c4c0000 0x0 0x00010000>,
>>>>> +			      <0x0 0x0c42d000 0x0 0x00010000>;
>>>>
>>>> This is a patch from December 2021. Is there anything blocking it from
>>>> being merged?
>>>>
>>>> The same applies to several other patches here.
>>>
>>> As far as I know, Stephen still didn't pick up the spmi-pmic-arb support
>>> for the PMIC on the SM8450 platform. Thus we also can not merge the DT
>>> parts.
>>
>> Why we cannot merge DTS? How is DTS with new nodes depending on any
>> driver changes?
> 
> In this particular case, there was an open question, what should be the 
> bindings for the PMIC ARB v7.

Ah, so it is about PMIC ARB v7 bindings? Then it's reasonable to wait
with this one. I just had an impression that it's about driver changes...

> 
>>
>> Just like I replied to Konrad - if that's true, bindings are simply
>> wrong and should be fixed.
> 
> Maybe I missed the reply. Which email are you referring to?

I meant about this one:

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/8c1428a6-f268-cb03-3e55-887d30236924@xxxxxxxxxx/T/#m50f4c72775492046f9b0a172e974cab83563af3c

Best regards,
Krzysztof