Re: [PATCH V4 1/2] RISC-V: Add arch_crash_save_vmcoreinfo support

From: Baoquan He
Date: Mon Oct 31 2022 - 04:59:08 EST

Next message: Borislav Petkov: "Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] x86: Fix /proc/cpuinfo cpumask warning"
Previous message: Luca Weiss: "Re: [PATCH 10/10] arm64: dts: qcom: sm6350: Add apps_smmu with streamID to SDHCI 1/2 nodes"
In reply to: Xianting Tian: "Re: [PATCH V4 1/2] RISC-V: Add arch_crash_save_vmcoreinfo support"
Next in thread: Xianting Tian: "Re: [PATCH V4 1/2] RISC-V: Add arch_crash_save_vmcoreinfo support"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 10/26/22 at 02:47pm, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 08:05:41PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> > Hi Xianting,
> >
> > On 10/26/22 at 05:44pm, Xianting Tian wrote:
> > >
> > > 在 2022/10/26 下午5:25, Conor Dooley 写道:
> > > > On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 05:08:11PM +0800, Xianting Tian wrote:
> > > > > Hi Palmer, Conor
> > > > >
> > > > > Is this version OK for you?
> > > > The weird ifdef/IS_ENABLED thing was the only comment I had. It's a bit
> > > > odd & I notice Baoquan brought it up too. I didn't (and won't) give you
> > > > a reviewed by on these patches because I don't understand the area well
> > > > enough. The general nitpickery seems to be sorted though.
> > >
> > > I checked the KERNEL_LINK_ADDR definition of riscv, it is valid for
> > > CONFIG_64BIT and !CONFIG_64BIT.
> >
> > This series looks good to me. My only minor concern is if we can make
> > the arch_crash_save_vmcoreinfo() as below. I don't understand why we
> > have to have the CONFIG_64BIT ifdeffery and the IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_64BIT)
> > between two adjacent code blocks. Not sure if we are saying the same
> > thing.
>
> I think we can just go and drop the IS_ENABLED(). From looking at it
> last time, one bit is compileable (but not usable) for !64BIT and the
> other isn't hence the IS_ENABLED(). I think it would make sense to drop
> the IS_ENABLED() - I don't think we're too likely to hit some compile
> testing edge cases that IS_ENABLED() would help with & only having one
> makes the code look a lot less odd and a lot more intentional.

I check risc-v code again, and agree we can drop the IS_ENABLED checking
to export KERNEL_LINK_ADDR anyway. We can surely deduce
KERNEL_LINK_ADDR in userspace e.g makedumpfile/Crash, while it seems no
harm to get it from the vmcoreinfo directly.

As for the difference between "#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT" and
"if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_64BIT))", I haven't got what's the Xianting's
point. Below is the IS_ENABLED definition in include/linux/kconfig.h,
it's truly different than #ifdef, while the change we are discussing
here is not related.

/*
* IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FOO) evaluates to 1 if CONFIG_FOO is set to 'y' or 'm',
* 0 otherwise. Note that CONFIG_FOO=y results in "#define CONFIG_FOO 1" in
* autoconf.h, while CONFIG_FOO=m results in "#define CONFIG_FOO_MODULE 1".
*/
#define IS_ENABLED(option) __or(IS_BUILTIN(option), IS_MODULE(option))

>
> >
> > +void arch_crash_save_vmcoreinfo(void)
> > +{
> > + VMCOREINFO_NUMBER(VA_BITS);
> > + VMCOREINFO_NUMBER(phys_ram_base);
> > +
> > + vmcoreinfo_append_str("NUMBER(PAGE_OFFSET)=0x%lx\n", PAGE_OFFSET);
> > + vmcoreinfo_append_str("NUMBER(VMALLOC_START)=0x%lx\n", VMALLOC_START);
> > + vmcoreinfo_append_str("NUMBER(VMALLOC_END)=0x%lx\n", VMALLOC_END);
> > + vmcoreinfo_append_str("NUMBER(VMEMMAP_START)=0x%lx\n", VMEMMAP_START);
> > + vmcoreinfo_append_str("NUMBER(VMEMMAP_END)=0x%lx\n", VMEMMAP_END);
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
> > + vmcoreinfo_append_str("NUMBER(MODULES_VADDR)=0x%lx\n", MODULES_VADDR);
> > + vmcoreinfo_append_str("NUMBER(MODULES_END)=0x%lx\n", MODULES_END);
> > + vmcoreinfo_append_str("NUMBER(KERNEL_LINK_ADDR)=0x%lx\n", KERNEL_LINK_ADDR);
> > +#endif
> > +}
> >
> > >
> > > Maybe we can remove IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_64BIT)
> > >
> > > arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h
> > > #define ADDRESS_SPACE_END       (UL(-1))
> > > #ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
> > > /* Leave 2GB for kernel and BPF at the end of the address space */
> > > #define KERNEL_LINK_ADDR        (ADDRESS_SPACE_END - SZ_2G + 1)
> > > #else
> > > #define KERNEL_LINK_ADDR        PAGE_OFFSET
> > > #endif
> > >
> > > arch/riscv/include/asm/page.h
> > > #ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
> > > #ifdef CONFIG_MMU
> > > #define PAGE_OFFSET             kernel_map.page_offset
> > > #else
> > > #define PAGE_OFFSET             _AC(CONFIG_PAGE_OFFSET, UL)
> > > #endif
> > > /*
> > > * By default, CONFIG_PAGE_OFFSET value corresponds to SV48 address space so
> > > * define the PAGE_OFFSET value for SV39.
> > > */
> > > #define PAGE_OFFSET_L4          _AC(0xffffaf8000000000, UL)
> > > #define PAGE_OFFSET_L3          _AC(0xffffffd800000000, UL)
> > > #else
> > > #define PAGE_OFFSET             _AC(CONFIG_PAGE_OFFSET, UL)
> > > #endif /* CONFIG_64BIT */
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Conor.
> > > >
> > > > > 在 2022/10/20 下午12:40, Xianting Tian 写道:
> > > > > > 在 2022/10/20 上午11:05, Baoquan He 写道:
> > > > > > > On 10/20/22 at 10:17am, Xianting Tian wrote:
> > > > > > > > 在 2022/10/20 上午10:08, Baoquan He 写道:
> > > > > > > > > On 10/19/22 at 06:36pm, Xianting Tian wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > Add arch_crash_save_vmcoreinfo(), which exports VM
> > > > > > > > > > layout(MODULES, VMALLOC,
> > > > > > > > > > VMEMMAP ranges and KERNEL_LINK_ADDR), va bits and ram
> > > > > > > > > > base for vmcore.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Default pagetable levels and PAGE_OFFSET aren't same for
> > > > > > > > > > different kernel
> > > > > > > > > > version as below. For pagetable levels, it sets sv57 by
> > > > > > > > > > default and falls
> > > > > > > > > > back to setting sv48 at boot time if sv57 is not
> > > > > > > > > > supported by the hardware.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > For ram base, the default value is 0x80200000 for qemu
> > > > > > > > > > riscv64 env and,
> > > > > > > > > > for example, is 0x200000 on the XuanTie 910 CPU.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >    * Linux Kernel 5.18 ~
> > > > > > > > > >    *      PGTABLE_LEVELS = 5
> > > > > > > > > >    *      PAGE_OFFSET = 0xff60000000000000
> > > > > > > > > >    * Linux Kernel 5.17 ~
> > > > > > > > > >    *      PGTABLE_LEVELS = 4
> > > > > > > > > >    *      PAGE_OFFSET = 0xffffaf8000000000
> > > > > > > > > >    * Linux Kernel 4.19 ~
> > > > > > > > > >    *      PGTABLE_LEVELS = 3
> > > > > > > > > >    *      PAGE_OFFSET = 0xffffffe000000000
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Since these configurations change from time to time and
> > > > > > > > > > version to version,
> > > > > > > > > > it is preferable to export them via vmcoreinfo than to
> > > > > > > > > > change the crash's
> > > > > > > > > > code frequently, it can simplify the development of crash tool.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Xianting Tian <xianting.tian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > > > > >    arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile     | 1 +
> > > > > > > > > >    arch/riscv/kernel/crash_core.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > > > > > > >    2 files changed, 24 insertions(+)
> > > > > > > > > >    create mode 100644 arch/riscv/kernel/crash_core.c
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile b/arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile
> > > > > > > > > > index db6e4b1294ba..4cf303a779ab 100644
> > > > > > > > > > --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile
> > > > > > > > > > +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile
> > > > > > > > > > @@ -81,6 +81,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_KGDB)        += kgdb.o
> > > > > > > > > >    obj-$(CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE)    += kexec_relocate.o
> > > > > > > > > > crash_save_regs.o machine_kexec.o
> > > > > > > > > >    obj-$(CONFIG_KEXEC_FILE)    += elf_kexec.o machine_kexec_file.o
> > > > > > > > > >    obj-$(CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP)    += crash_dump.o
> > > > > > > > > > +obj-$(CONFIG_CRASH_CORE)    += crash_core.o
> > > > > > > > > >    obj-$(CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL)    += jump_label.o
> > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/crash_core.c
> > > > > > > > > > b/arch/riscv/kernel/crash_core.c
> > > > > > > > > > new file mode 100644
> > > > > > > > > > index 000000000000..3e889d0ed7bd
> > > > > > > > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > > > > > > > +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/crash_core.c
> > > > > > > > > > @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
> > > > > > > > > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> > > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > > +#include <linux/crash_core.h>
> > > > > > > > > > +#include <linux/pagemap.h>
> > > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > > +void arch_crash_save_vmcoreinfo(void)
> > > > > > > > > > +{
> > > > > > > > > > +    VMCOREINFO_NUMBER(VA_BITS);
> > > > > > > > > > +    VMCOREINFO_NUMBER(phys_ram_base);
> > > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > > vmcoreinfo_append_str("NUMBER(PAGE_OFFSET)=0x%lx\n",
> > > > > > > > > > PAGE_OFFSET);
> > > > > > > > > > + vmcoreinfo_append_str("NUMBER(VMALLOC_START)=0x%lx\n",
> > > > > > > > > > VMALLOC_START);
> > > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > > vmcoreinfo_append_str("NUMBER(VMALLOC_END)=0x%lx\n",
> > > > > > > > > > VMALLOC_END);
> > > > > > > > > > + vmcoreinfo_append_str("NUMBER(VMEMMAP_START)=0x%lx\n",
> > > > > > > > > > VMEMMAP_START);
> > > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > > vmcoreinfo_append_str("NUMBER(VMEMMAP_END)=0x%lx\n",
> > > > > > > > > > VMEMMAP_END);
> > > > > > > > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
> > > > > > > > > > + vmcoreinfo_append_str("NUMBER(MODULES_VADDR)=0x%lx\n",
> > > > > > > > > > MODULES_VADDR);
> > > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > > vmcoreinfo_append_str("NUMBER(MODULES_END)=0x%lx\n",
> > > > > > > > > > MODULES_END);
> > > > > > > > > > +#endif
> > > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > > +    if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_64BIT))
> > > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > > vmcoreinfo_append_str("NUMBER(KERNEL_LINK_ADDR)=0x%lx\n",
> > > > > > > > > > KERNEL_LINK_ADDR);
> > > > > > > > > Wondering why you don't put KERNEL_LINK_ADDR exporting into the above
> > > > > > > > > ifdeffery scope, with that you can save one line of
> > > > > > > > > "IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_64BIT)".
> > > > > > > > I followed the rule in print_vm_layout() of
> > > > > > > > arch/riscv/mm/init.c, which used
> > > > > > > > IS_ENABLED when print the value of KERNEL_LINK_ADDR.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I see. There's PAGE_OFFSET in the middle. Thanks.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >          print_ml("lowmem", (unsigned long)PAGE_OFFSET,
> > > > > > >                  (unsigned long)high_memory)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > So now, do you think if it's necessary to have another
> > > > > > > IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_64BIT) in the current arch_crash_save_vmcoreinfo()?
> > > > > > For which MACRO? I think current code for PAGE_OFFSET is OK.
> > > > > >
> > >
> >
>

Next message: Borislav Petkov: "Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] x86: Fix /proc/cpuinfo cpumask warning"
Previous message: Luca Weiss: "Re: [PATCH 10/10] arm64: dts: qcom: sm6350: Add apps_smmu with streamID to SDHCI 1/2 nodes"
In reply to: Xianting Tian: "Re: [PATCH V4 1/2] RISC-V: Add arch_crash_save_vmcoreinfo support"
Next in thread: Xianting Tian: "Re: [PATCH V4 1/2] RISC-V: Add arch_crash_save_vmcoreinfo support"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]