Re: [PATCH v6 0/4] workqueue: destroy_worker() vs isolated CPUs
From:
Tejun Heo
Date:
Wed Nov 30 2022 - 16:07:03 EST
Next message:
Tejun Heo: "Re: [PATCH v2 01/10] blk-throttle: correct stale comment in throtl_pd_init"
Previous message:
Tejun Heo: "Re: [PATCH v6 3/4] workqueue: Convert the idle_timer to a timer + work_struct"
In reply to:
Valentin Schneider: "[PATCH v6 1/4] workqueue: Protects wq_unbound_cpumask with wq_pool_attach_mutex"
Next in thread:
Lai Jiangshan: "Re: [PATCH v6 0/4] workqueue: destroy_worker() vs isolated CPUs"
Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
Hello,
So, this generally looks great to me. Lai, what do you think?
Thanks.
--
tejun
Next message:
Tejun Heo: "Re: [PATCH v2 01/10] blk-throttle: correct stale comment in throtl_pd_init"
Previous message:
Tejun Heo: "Re: [PATCH v6 3/4] workqueue: Convert the idle_timer to a timer + work_struct"
In reply to:
Valentin Schneider: "[PATCH v6 1/4] workqueue: Protects wq_unbound_cpumask with wq_pool_attach_mutex"
Next in thread:
Lai Jiangshan: "Re: [PATCH v6 0/4] workqueue: destroy_worker() vs isolated CPUs"
Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]