Re: [PATCH v6 0/4] workqueue: destroy_worker() vs isolated CPUs

From: Lai Jiangshan
Date: Wed Nov 30 2022 - 22:05:31 EST

Next message: Bagas Sanjaya: "Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] Documentation: riscv: add a section about ISA string ordering in /proc/cpuinfo"
Previous message: ye.xingchen: "[PATCH] HID: use sysfs_emit() to instead of scnprintf()"
In reply to: Tejun Heo: "Re: [PATCH v6 0/4] workqueue: destroy_worker() vs isolated CPUs"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Thu, Dec 1, 2022 at 5:06 AM Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> So, this generally looks great to me. Lai, what do you think?
>
> Thanks.
>

Hello,

It looks great to me too. (except for a defect in patch4)

Reviewed-by: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@xxxxxxxxx>

Thanks
Lai

Next message: Bagas Sanjaya: "Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] Documentation: riscv: add a section about ISA string ordering in /proc/cpuinfo"
Previous message: ye.xingchen: "[PATCH] HID: use sysfs_emit() to instead of scnprintf()"
In reply to: Tejun Heo: "Re: [PATCH v6 0/4] workqueue: destroy_worker() vs isolated CPUs"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]