Re: [PATCH] trace: Fix some checker warnings
From: Google
Date: Sun Dec 04 2022 - 22:32:10 EST
On Thu, 01 Dec 2022 20:07:39 +0000
David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Fix some checker warning in the trace code:
>
> (1) The declaration of tracing_max_lat_fops should be conditionally
> defined like its definition.
>
> (2) A number of trace functions, and their declarations where present,
> should have __printf attributes.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
> cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> include/linux/trace_events.h | 3 ++-
> include/linux/trace_seq.h | 3 ++-
> kernel/trace/trace.c | 2 ++
> kernel/trace/trace.h | 2 +-
> kernel/trace/trace_output.c | 5 +++--
> 5 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/trace_events.h b/include/linux/trace_events.h
> index 20749bd9db71..112b08ca2c5c 100644
> --- a/include/linux/trace_events.h
> +++ b/include/linux/trace_events.h
> @@ -235,7 +235,8 @@ void tracing_record_taskinfo_sched_switch(struct task_struct *prev,
> void tracing_record_cmdline(struct task_struct *task);
> void tracing_record_tgid(struct task_struct *task);
>
> -int trace_output_call(struct trace_iterator *iter, char *name, char *fmt, ...);
> +int trace_output_call(struct trace_iterator *iter, char *name, char *fmt, ...)
> + __printf(3, 4);
>
> struct event_filter;
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/trace_seq.h b/include/linux/trace_seq.h
> index 5a2c650d9e1c..0c4c7587d6c3 100644
> --- a/include/linux/trace_seq.h
> +++ b/include/linux/trace_seq.h
> @@ -97,7 +97,8 @@ extern int trace_seq_hex_dump(struct trace_seq *s, const char *prefix_str,
> const void *buf, size_t len, bool ascii);
>
> #else /* CONFIG_TRACING */
> -static inline void trace_seq_printf(struct trace_seq *s, const char *fmt, ...)
> +static inline __printf(2, 3)
> +void trace_seq_printf(struct trace_seq *s, const char *fmt, ...)
> {
> }
> static inline void
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.c b/kernel/trace/trace.c
> index 5cfc95a52bc3..9da61a54e187 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace.c
> @@ -1692,7 +1692,9 @@ static ssize_t trace_seq_to_buffer(struct trace_seq *s, void *buf, size_t cnt)
> }
>
> unsigned long __read_mostly tracing_thresh;
> +#if defined(CONFIG_TRACER_MAX_TRACE) || defined(CONFIG_HWLAT_TRACER)
> static const struct file_operations tracing_max_lat_fops;
> +#endif
Oops, I missed this part. Why did you introduced this #ifdefs?
Thank you,
>
> #ifdef LATENCY_FS_NOTIFY
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.h b/kernel/trace/trace.h
> index d42e24507152..ecc6120116da 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace.h
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace.h
> @@ -615,7 +615,7 @@ void trace_buffer_unlock_commit_nostack(struct trace_buffer *buffer,
> bool trace_is_tracepoint_string(const char *str);
> const char *trace_event_format(struct trace_iterator *iter, const char *fmt);
> void trace_check_vprintf(struct trace_iterator *iter, const char *fmt,
> - va_list ap);
> + va_list ap) __printf(2, 0);
>
> int trace_empty(struct trace_iterator *iter);
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_output.c b/kernel/trace/trace_output.c
> index 67f47ea27921..7039cd883c8b 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_output.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_output.c
> @@ -323,8 +323,9 @@ void trace_event_printf(struct trace_iterator *iter, const char *fmt, ...)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(trace_event_printf);
>
> -static int trace_output_raw(struct trace_iterator *iter, char *name,
> - char *fmt, va_list ap)
> +static __printf(3, 0)
> +int trace_output_raw(struct trace_iterator *iter, char *name,
> + char *fmt, va_list ap)
> {
> struct trace_seq *s = &iter->seq;
>
>
>
--
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>