Re: [PATCH 2/3] memory: atmel-sdramc: remove the driver

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 03/01/2023 13:45, Claudiu.Beznea@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

>>>> Uh, why does it depend? I understood the changset is bisectable and
>>>> removal of unneeded driver will happen later. Otherwise it is not
>>>> bisectable...
>>>
>>> AT91 devices will fail to boot if this patch is applied and 1/3 is not
>>> there. This is because clock framework will disable DDR clocks because
>>> there will be no consumer for them.
>>
>> This I understand, but why do you need this patch to be able to apply
>> 1/3? 
> 
> To avoid having AT91 devices failing to boot in case your tree (containing
> this patch) is merged  first.

But this patch is not going to be merged first. It will wait one more
cycle, so the dependency is there.

If you need to make it in one cycle for some reason, then I would need
stable tag with the clock patch.

Best regards,
Krzysztof