Re: [PATCH 2/3] memory: atmel-sdramc: remove the driver

[Claudiu.Beznea]

On 03.01.2023 15:17, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
> 
> On 03/01/2023 13:45, Claudiu.Beznea@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> 
>>>>> Uh, why does it depend? I understood the changset is bisectable and
>>>>> removal of unneeded driver will happen later. Otherwise it is not
>>>>> bisectable...
>>>>
>>>> AT91 devices will fail to boot if this patch is applied and 1/3 is not
>>>> there. This is because clock framework will disable DDR clocks because
>>>> there will be no consumer for them.
>>>
>>> This I understand, but why do you need this patch to be able to apply
>>> 1/3?
>>
>> To avoid having AT91 devices failing to boot in case your tree (containing
>> this patch) is merged  first.
> 
> But this patch is not going to be merged first. It will wait one more
> cycle, so the dependency is there.

OK. All good this way.

Thank you,
Claudiu

> 
> If you need to make it in one cycle for some reason, then I would need
> stable tag with the clock patch.
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>