Re: [PATCH] netfilter: conntrack: remote a return value of the 'seq_print_acct' function.

From: Leon Romanovsky
Date: Mon Jan 23 2023 - 08:28:58 EST


On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 08:19:50AM +0000, Gavrilov Ilia wrote:
> The static 'seq_print_acct' function always returns 0.
>
> Change the return value to 'void' and remove unnecessary checks.
>
> Found by InfoTeCS on behalf of Linux Verification Center
> (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.
>
> Fixes: 1ca9e41770cb ("netfilter: Remove uses of seq_<foo> return values")
> Signed-off-by: Ilia.Gavrilov <Ilia.Gavrilov@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_standalone.c | 26 ++++++++++---------------
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_standalone.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_standalone.c
> index 0250725e38a4..bee99d4bcf36 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_standalone.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_standalone.c
> @@ -275,22 +275,18 @@ static const char* l4proto_name(u16 proto)
> return "unknown";
> }
>
> -static unsigned int
> +static void
> seq_print_acct(struct seq_file *s, const struct nf_conn *ct, int dir)
> {
> - struct nf_conn_acct *acct;
> - struct nf_conn_counter *counter;
> + struct nf_conn_acct *acct = nf_conn_acct_find(ct);
>
> - acct = nf_conn_acct_find(ct);
> - if (!acct)
> - return 0;
> -
> - counter = acct->counter;
> - seq_printf(s, "packets=%llu bytes=%llu ",
> - (unsigned long long)atomic64_read(&counter[dir].packets),
> - (unsigned long long)atomic64_read(&counter[dir].bytes));
> + if (acct) {
> + struct nf_conn_counter *counter = acct->counter;
>
> - return 0;
> + seq_printf(s, "packets=%llu bytes=%llu ",
> + (unsigned long long)atomic64_read(&counter[dir].packets),
> + (unsigned long long)atomic64_read(&counter[dir].bytes));
> + }

The preferred linux kernel style is to perform if (check_error) return;
In this case, this pattern should stay.

acct = nf_conn_acct_find(ct);
if (!acct)
return;

Thanks