Re: [PATCH] netfilter: conntrack: remote a return value of the 'seq_print_acct' function.

From: Gavrilov Ilia
Date: Mon Jan 23 2023 - 09:06:47 EST





С уважением,
Илья Гаврилов
Ведущий программист
Отдел разработки
АО "ИнфоТеКС" в г. Санкт-Петербург
127287, г. Москва, Старый Петровско-Разумовский проезд, дом 1/23, стр. 1
T: +7 495 737-61-92 ( доб. 4921)
Ф: +7 495 737-72-78


Ilia.Gavrilov@xxxxxxxxxxx
www.infotecs.ru


On 1/23/23 16:28, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 08:19:50AM +0000, Gavrilov Ilia wrote:
>> The static 'seq_print_acct' function always returns 0.
>>
>> Change the return value to 'void' and remove unnecessary checks.
>>
>> Found by InfoTeCS on behalf of Linux Verification Center
>> (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.
>>
>> Fixes: 1ca9e41770cb ("netfilter: Remove uses of seq_<foo> return values")
>> Signed-off-by: Ilia.Gavrilov <Ilia.Gavrilov@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_standalone.c | 26 ++++++++++---------------
>> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_standalone.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_standalone.c
>> index 0250725e38a4..bee99d4bcf36 100644
>> --- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_standalone.c
>> +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_standalone.c
>> @@ -275,22 +275,18 @@ static const char* l4proto_name(u16 proto)
>> return "unknown";
>> }
>>
>> -static unsigned int
>> +static void
>> seq_print_acct(struct seq_file *s, const struct nf_conn *ct, int dir)
>> {
>> -struct nf_conn_acct *acct;
>> -struct nf_conn_counter *counter;
>> +struct nf_conn_acct *acct = nf_conn_acct_find(ct);
>>
>> -acct = nf_conn_acct_find(ct);
>> -if (!acct)
>> -return 0;
>> -
>> -counter = acct->counter;
>> -seq_printf(s, "packets=%llu bytes=%llu ",
>> - (unsigned long long)atomic64_read(&counter[dir].packets),
>> - (unsigned long long)atomic64_read(&counter[dir].bytes));
>> +if (acct) {
>> +struct nf_conn_counter *counter = acct->counter;
>>
>> -return 0;
>> +seq_printf(s, "packets=%llu bytes=%llu ",
>> + (unsigned long long)atomic64_read(&counter[dir].packets),
>> + (unsigned long long)atomic64_read(&counter[dir].bytes));
>> +}
>
> The preferred linux kernel style is to perform if (check_error) return;
> In this case, this pattern should stay.
>
> acct = nf_conn_acct_find(ct);
> if (!acct)
> return;
>
> Thanks

Thank you for review. I'll fix it in v2.