Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: Add Loongson EIOINTC

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 17/02/2023 07:09, Binbin Zhou wrote:

>>> Hi Krzysztof:
>>>
>>> Allow me to give a brief overview of the current status of eiointc (DT-based):
>>>      Loongson-3A series supports eiointc;
>>>      Loongson-2K1000 does not support eiointc now;
>>>      Loongson-2K0500 supports eiointc, with differences from
>>> Loongson-3, e.g. only up to 128 devices are supported;
>>>      Loongson-2K2000 supports eiointc, similar to Loongson-3.
>>>      ....
>>>
>>> As can be seen, there is now a bit of confusion in the chip's design of eiointc.
>>>
>>> The design of eiointc is probably refined step by step with the chip.
>>> The same version of eiointc can be used for multiple chips, and the
>>> same chip series may also use different versions of eiointc. Low-end
>>> chips may use eiointc-2.0, and high-end chips may use eiointc-1.0,
>>> depending on the time it's produced.
>>>
>>> So in the Loongson-2K series I have defined the current state as
>>> eiointc-1.0, using the dts property to indicate the maximum number of
>>> devices supported by eiointc that can be used directly in the driver.
>>>
>>> If there are new changes to the design later on, such as the
>>> definition of registers, we can call it eiointc-2.0, which can also
>>> cover more than one chip.
>>
>> Just go with SoC-based compatibles. If your version is not specific
>> enough, then it is not a good way to represent the hardware.
>>
> 
> Hi Krzysztof:
> 
> I have tried to write the following  SoC-based compatibles,  is it fine?
> 
> compatible:
>     enum:
>       - loongson,ls3a-eiointc  # For MIPS Loongson-3A if necessary.
>       - loongson,ls2k0500-eiointc
>       - loongson,ls2k200-eiointc

Looks good, but didn't you state these are compatible between each
other? I have impression there is a common set, so maybe one compatible
work on other device with reduced number of devices?

Best regards,
Krzysztof