Re: [PATCH 04/11] apparmor: simplify sysctls with register_sysctl_init()
From: Georgia Garcia
Date: Thu Mar 02 2023 - 15:42:29 EST
On Thu, 2023-03-02 at 12:28 -0800, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> Using register_sysctl_paths() is really only needed if you have
> subdirectories with entries. We can use the simple register_sysctl()
> instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> security/apparmor/lsm.c | 8 +-------
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/security/apparmor/lsm.c b/security/apparmor/lsm.c
> index d6cc4812ca53..47c7ec7e5a80 100644
> --- a/security/apparmor/lsm.c
> +++ b/security/apparmor/lsm.c
> @@ -1764,11 +1764,6 @@ static int apparmor_dointvec(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
> return proc_dointvec(table, write, buffer, lenp, ppos);
> }
>
> -static struct ctl_path apparmor_sysctl_path[] = {
> - { .procname = "kernel", },
> - { }
> -};
> -
> static struct ctl_table apparmor_sysctl_table[] = {
> {
> .procname = "unprivileged_userns_apparmor_policy",
> @@ -1790,8 +1785,7 @@ static struct ctl_table apparmor_sysctl_table[] = {
>
> static int __init apparmor_init_sysctl(void)
> {
> - return register_sysctl_paths(apparmor_sysctl_path,
> - apparmor_sysctl_table) ? 0 : -ENOMEM;
> + return register_sysctl("kernel", apparmor_sysctl_table) ? 0 : -ENOMEM;
> }
> #else
> static inline int apparmor_init_sysctl(void)
Reviewed-by: Georgia Garcia <georgia.garcia@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>