Re: [PATCH 04/11] apparmor: simplify sysctls with register_sysctl_init()

[John Johansen]

On 3/2/23 12:28, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> Using register_sysctl_paths() is really only needed if you have
> subdirectories with entries. We can use the simple register_sysctl()
> instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> ---
>   security/apparmor/lsm.c | 8 +-------
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/security/apparmor/lsm.c b/security/apparmor/lsm.c
> index d6cc4812ca53..47c7ec7e5a80 100644
> --- a/security/apparmor/lsm.c
> +++ b/security/apparmor/lsm.c
> @@ -1764,11 +1764,6 @@ static int apparmor_dointvec(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
>   	return proc_dointvec(table, write, buffer, lenp, ppos);
>   }
>   
> -static struct ctl_path apparmor_sysctl_path[] = {
> -	{ .procname = "kernel", },
> -	{ }
> -};
> -
>   static struct ctl_table apparmor_sysctl_table[] = {
>   	{
>   		.procname       = "unprivileged_userns_apparmor_policy",
> @@ -1790,8 +1785,7 @@ static struct ctl_table apparmor_sysctl_table[] = {
>   
>   static int __init apparmor_init_sysctl(void)
>   {
> -	return register_sysctl_paths(apparmor_sysctl_path,
> -				     apparmor_sysctl_table) ? 0 : -ENOMEM;
> +	return register_sysctl("kernel", apparmor_sysctl_table) ? 0 : -ENOMEM;
>   }
>   #else
>   static inline int apparmor_init_sysctl(void)