Re: [PATCH 7/8] arm64: dts: qcom: ipq9574: Add USB related nodes
From: Varadarajan Narayanan
Date: Mon Mar 06 2023 - 06:27:05 EST
Dmitry,
On 3/2/2023 9:52 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
On Thu, 2 Mar 2023 at 11:57, Varadarajan Narayanan
<quic_varada@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Add USB phy and controller related nodes
Signed-off-by: Varadarajan Narayanan <quic_varada@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi | 92 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 92 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi
index 2bb4053..319b5bd 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi
@@ -215,6 +215,98 @@
#size-cells = <1>;
ranges = <0 0 0 0xffffffff>;
+ ssphy_0: ssphy@7D000 {
+ compatible = "qcom,ipq9574-qmp-usb3-phy";
+ reg = <0x7D000 0x1C4>;
+ #clock-cells = <1>;
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <1>;
+ ranges;
+
+ clocks = <&gcc GCC_USB0_AUX_CLK>,
+ <&gcc GCC_USB0_PHY_CFG_AHB_CLK>;
+ clock-names = "aux", "cfg_ahb";
+
+ resets = <&gcc GCC_USB0_PHY_BCR>,
+ <&gcc GCC_USB3PHY_0_PHY_BCR>;
+ reset-names = "phy","common";
+ status = "disabled";
+
+ usb0_ssphy: lane@7D200 {
Please use newer style device bindings for new PHYs.
+ reg = <0x0007D200 0x130>, /* Tx */
+ <0x0007D400 0x200>, /* Rx */
+ <0x0007D800 0x1F8>, /* PCS */
+ <0x0007D600 0x044>; /* PCS misc */
+ #phy-cells = <0>;
+ clocks = <&gcc GCC_USB0_PIPE_CLK>;
+ clock-names = "pipe0";
+ clock-output-names = "gcc_usb0_pipe_clk_src";
No, this clock doesn't originate from gcc, so the gcc prefix is incorrect.
+ };
+ };
+
+ qusb_phy_0: qusb@7B000 {
+ compatible = "qcom,ipq9574-qusb2-phy";
+ reg = <0x07B000 0x180>;
+ #phy-cells = <0>;
+
+ clocks = <&gcc GCC_USB0_PHY_CFG_AHB_CLK>,
+ <&xo_board_clk>;
+ clock-names = "cfg_ahb", "ref";
+
+ resets = <&gcc GCC_QUSB2_0_PHY_BCR>;
+ status = "disabled";
+ };
+
+ usb3: usb3@8A00000 {
You know the drill. This node is in the wrong place.
+ compatible = "qcom,dwc3";
+ reg = <0x8AF8800 0x400>;
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <1>;
+ ranges;
+
+ clocks = <&gcc GCC_SNOC_USB_CLK>,
+ <&gcc GCC_ANOC_USB_AXI_CLK>,
+ <&gcc GCC_USB0_MASTER_CLK>,
+ <&gcc GCC_USB0_SLEEP_CLK>,
+ <&gcc GCC_USB0_MOCK_UTMI_CLK>;
+
+ clock-names = "sys_noc_axi",
+ "anoc_axi",
+ "master",
+ "sleep",
+ "mock_utmi";
Please fix the indentation of the lists.
+
+ assigned-clocks = <&gcc GCC_SNOC_USB_CLK>,
+ <&gcc GCC_ANOC_USB_AXI_CLK>,
Why do you assign clock rates to the NOC clocks? Should they be set
using the interconnect instead?
The SNOC and ANOC run at a fixed speed of 350MHz and 342MHz respectively
and are not scaled. These clocks are for the interface between the USB
block and the SNOC/ANOC. Do we still need to use interconnect?
+ <&gcc GCC_USB0_MASTER_CLK>,
+ <&gcc GCC_USB0_MOCK_UTMI_CLK>;
+ assigned-clock-rates = <200000000>,
+ <200000000>,
+ <200000000>,
+ <24000000>;
+
+ resets = <&gcc GCC_USB_BCR>;
+ status = "disabled";
+
+ dwc_0: dwc3@8A00000 {
+ compatible = "snps,dwc3";
+ reg = <0x8A00000 0xcd00>;
+ clock-names = "ref";
+ clocks = <&gcc GCC_USB0_MOCK_UTMI_CLK>;
clocks before clock-names
+ interrupts = <GIC_SPI 140 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
+ phys = <&qusb_phy_0>, <&usb0_ssphy>;
+ phy-names = "usb2-phy", "usb3-phy";
+ tx-fifo-resize;
+ snps,dis_ep_cache_eviction;
+ snps,is-utmi-l1-suspend;
+ snps,hird-threshold = /bits/ 8 <0x0>;
+ snps,dis_u2_susphy_quirk;
+ snps,dis_u3_susphy_quirk;
+ snps,quirk-frame-length-adjustment = <0x0A87F0A0>;
+ dr_mode = "host";
+ };
+ };
+
pcie0_phy: phy@84000 {
compatible = "qcom,ipq9574-qmp-gen3x1-pcie-phy";
reg = <0x00084000 0x1bc>; /* Serdes PLL */
--
2.7.4
Will address these and post a new revision.
Thanks
Varada