Re: [PATCH 7/8] arm64: dts: qcom: ipq9574: Add USB related nodes

From: Dmitry Baryshkov
Date: Mon Mar 06 2023 - 06:52:03 EST


On 06/03/2023 13:26, Varadarajan Narayanan wrote:
Dmitry,

On 3/2/2023 9:52 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
On Thu, 2 Mar 2023 at 11:57, Varadarajan Narayanan
<quic_varada@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Add USB phy and controller related nodes

Signed-off-by: Varadarajan Narayanan <quic_varada@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi | 92 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  1 file changed, 92 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi
index 2bb4053..319b5bd 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi

[skipped]


+               usb3: usb3@8A00000 {
You know the drill. This node is in the wrong place.

+                       compatible = "qcom,dwc3";
+                       reg = <0x8AF8800 0x400>;
+                       #address-cells = <1>;
+                       #size-cells = <1>;
+                       ranges;
+
+                       clocks = <&gcc GCC_SNOC_USB_CLK>,
+                               <&gcc GCC_ANOC_USB_AXI_CLK>,
+                               <&gcc GCC_USB0_MASTER_CLK>,
+                               <&gcc GCC_USB0_SLEEP_CLK>,
+                               <&gcc GCC_USB0_MOCK_UTMI_CLK>;
+
+                       clock-names = "sys_noc_axi",
+                               "anoc_axi",
+                               "master",
+                               "sleep",
+                               "mock_utmi";
Please fix the indentation of the lists.

+
+                       assigned-clocks = <&gcc GCC_SNOC_USB_CLK>,
+                                         <&gcc GCC_ANOC_USB_AXI_CLK>,
Why do you assign clock rates to the NOC clocks? Should they be set
using the interconnect instead?

The SNOC and ANOC run at a fixed speed of 350MHz and 342MHz respectively and are not scaled. These clocks are for the interface between the USB block and the SNOC/ANOC. Do we still need to use interconnect?

Maybe I misunderstand something here. If the snoc and anoc speeds are at 350 MHz and 342 MHz, why do you assign clock-rates of 200 MHz?

Is it enough to call clk_prepare_enable() for these clocks or the rate really needs to be set?



+                                         <&gcc GCC_USB0_MASTER_CLK>,
+                                         <&gcc GCC_USB0_MOCK_UTMI_CLK>;
+                       assigned-clock-rates = <200000000>,
+                                              <200000000>,
+                                              <200000000>,
+                                              <24000000>;
+
+                       resets = <&gcc GCC_USB_BCR>;
+                       status = "disabled";
+
+                       dwc_0: dwc3@8A00000 {
+                               compatible = "snps,dwc3";
+                               reg = <0x8A00000 0xcd00>;
+                               clock-names = "ref";
+                               clocks = <&gcc GCC_USB0_MOCK_UTMI_CLK>;
clocks before clock-names

+                               interrupts = <GIC_SPI 140 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
+                               phys = <&qusb_phy_0>, <&usb0_ssphy>;
+                               phy-names = "usb2-phy", "usb3-phy";
+                               tx-fifo-resize;
+                               snps,dis_ep_cache_eviction;
+                               snps,is-utmi-l1-suspend;
+                               snps,hird-threshold = /bits/ 8 <0x0>;
+                               snps,dis_u2_susphy_quirk;
+                               snps,dis_u3_susphy_quirk;
+                               snps,quirk-frame-length-adjustment = <0x0A87F0A0>;
+                               dr_mode = "host";
+                       };
+               };
+
                 pcie0_phy: phy@84000 {
                         compatible = "qcom,ipq9574-qmp-gen3x1-pcie-phy";
                         reg = <0x00084000 0x1bc>; /* Serdes PLL */
--
2.7.4

Will address these and post a new revision.

Thanks

Varada


--
With best wishes
Dmitry