Re: [PATCH 0/8] nvmem: Let layout drivers be modules

[Michael Walle]

Am 2023-03-06 14:57, schrieb Rafał Miłecki:
> On 2023-03-06 14:35, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> > Hi Michael,
> >
> > michael@xxxxxxxx wrote on Mon, 06 Mar 2023 14:01:34 +0100:
> >
> > > > Miquel Raynal (8):
> > > >   of: Fix modalias string generation
> > > >   of: Change of_device_get_modalias() main argument
> > > >   of: Create an of_device_request_module() receiving an OF node
> > > >   nvmem: core: Fix error path ordering
> > > >   nvmem: core: Handle the absence of expected layouts
> > > >   nvmem: core: Request layout modules loading
> > > >   nvmem: layouts: sl28vpd: Convert layout driver into a module
> > > >   nvmem: layouts: onie-tlv: Convert layout driver into a module
> > >
> > > With the fixes series [1] applied:
> >
> > Thanks for the series! Looks good to me. I believe both series can 
> > live
> > in separate tress, any reason why we would like to avoid this? I am 
> > keen
> > to apply [1] into the mtd tree rather soon.
>
> Given past events with nvmem patches I'm against that.
>
> Let's wait for Srinivas to collect pending patches, let them spend a
> moment in linux-next maybe, ask Srinivas to send them to Greg early if
> he can. That way maybe you can merge Greg's branch (assuming he doesn't
> rebase).

Mh? None of these fixes have anything to do with nvmem (except maybe 
patch
4/4). The bugs were just discovered while I was testing this series. But
OTOH they are kind of a prerequisite for this series. So what are you
suggesting here?

-michael